Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I disagree with this on the grounds of Kenshi, Dwarf Fortress, etc. Not saying dev should, but dev definitely could. I sincerely think this game is groundbreaking enough to deserve that kind of attention.
Then start on better sequel using the original as a foundation learning from the previous game to do it better.
Closing in on 80 hours played and it's still fresh enough to keep me interested. It definitely needs more types of murders and side missions to draw on (I keep getting the "Lets play a game" word scramble that takes literally seconds to figure out) but the randomness of the city and it's people keeps things interesting.
I love the murders and side jobs that give you almost nothing (size 13 shoes, loves music) to go on and can take hours to solve.
Even knowing what makes game tick, getting a good case is always satisfying. The whole process of solving them scratches the itch for investigatory type of games, since solutions are things you come up with, how to apply your knowledge, instead of mechanical knowledge + sometimes a little bit of luck.
If this is "the game" - i am 100% content with that.