Temp bans for quitting in Social is dumb

[DethMerchant2001]

Its the year of our Lord 2024, and game developers still havent learned that being in lobbies with cheaters or people who have had a 360 controller physically grafted to their hands since 2007 isnt fun. And people go to Social to have fun. I understand having penalties in ranked game modes. Thats fine. I dont played Ranked anyway.

Then, there is the issue of the ban system not working properly. I quit a game because my opponent is apparently Jesus and get my 3 minute ban. When the ban should be over, it mystically extends itself 15 minutes. Maybe the 343i knew they were going to match me against Jesus Christ again and just wanted to be proactive in delivering swift and righteous punishment for the sin of wanting to have some semblance of fun.

[itzRiceKrispies]

Zero님이 먼저 게시:

Tommy Wiseau님이 먼저 게시:

"THATS NOT AN EXCUSE MY EXPERIENCE IS RUINED MY TIME IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOURS AND VIDEO GAMES ARE ALL I DO WITH MY TIME!"

^Common 30 year old sweats response.

30? You're hilarious. It's Gen Z that cries about that garbage. Try early-20s and younger.

Not quite Zero. They we're early to mid teens about 15 years ago when the game came out. Most from then are still playing it even now. It's hard to believe but in regards to those cheaters Marko Rages and Idul(2 of the more famous ones) r STILL doing that superman-aimbot ♥♥♥♥ to piss people off even after all of this time.

It's insane.

[itzRiceKrispies]

Tommy Wiseau님이 먼저 게시:

Zero님이 먼저 게시:

30? You're hilarious. It's Gen Z that cries about that garbage. Try early-20s and younger.

Average age for a gamer is 30s, gen z dosnt go hard on halo they watch people play games on twitch and get scammed out of their money.

HAHAHAHAH. Awarded.

[Kitt 🌟 Stargazer]

No one wants worthless teammates on their team, that's why quit bans exist.

Personally, I feel they should make it that quitters just get lobbied with other quitters before putting them with decent human beings myself though. Include a scale system, the more you quit, the more likely you're going to be placed with other quitters. It doesn't go away with time either, you need to stop quitting in order stop being placed with quitters if it bothers you. The more you quit, the more games you need to play completely before it starts changing.

I mean, since people feel that people be allowed to quit at any given moment. Then they should have absolutely no problem playing with nothing but quitters in their matches right? They can even remove the quit ban feature entirely with this.

Derezz3d님이 먼저 게시:

If they'd allow people to fill the slot of a quitter I'd agree with you

Why would anyone want to do this? People want fresh new matches. We don't want to tossed into a match where as soon as we enter we have to quickly figure out just what the heck is even going on and quickly adjust to the situation.

Tommy Wiseau님이 먼저 게시:

Listen here its 2024 you must put EVERYTHING on hold to play ♥♥♥♥♥♥ video games! I dont care if your house is being broken into or your child fell and broke his leg. YOU FINISH THAT ROUND OF HALO NOW!!!:kratos_rage:

AlastairKD님이 먼저 게시:

Considering Social Matchmaking is meant to be unranked, I agree that you shouldn't be temp banned for leaving. Sometimes the game crashes, sometimes stuff pops up and you gotta get off.

Yeah, except most people don't leave for something important, I'd argue that nearly 100% are for selfish reasons and they only claim it's something important coming up is just to try to justify a good reason to having to leave.

"Something big came up"
Yeah, don't believe you liar lol... More so when I see you just requeued up for a match right after leaving.

Tommy Wiseau님이 먼저 게시:

This is why is the game is dead.

Quit penalties have been in the game since the original release of Halo 2 though and the franchise still isn't dead.

[itzRiceKrispies]

Kitt 🌟 Stargazer님이 먼저 게시:

Quit penalties have been in the game since the original release of Halo 2 though and the franchise still isn't dead. :rat_thinking:

As someone who has been around since CE, this franchise is on life support and that is in someways even sadder the being straight up dead. Literally being kept alive by a bunch of MLG tryhards.

[Kitt 🌟 Stargazer]

itzRiceKrispies님이 먼저 게시:

Kitt 🌟 Stargazer님이 먼저 게시:

Quit penalties have been in the game since the original release of Halo 2 though and the franchise still isn't dead.

As someone who has been around since CE, this franchise is on life support and that is in someways even sadder the being straight up dead. Literally being kept alive by a bunch of MLG tryhards.

I wasn't aware that people just wanting fun matches from start to finish that constantly get ruined by dead beat losers that abandon minutes into a match regularly qualify them to be MLG Tryhards.

[Tommy Wiseau]

Kitt 🌟 Stargazer님이 먼저 게시:

itzRiceKrispies님이 먼저 게시:

As someone who has been around since CE, this franchise is on life support and that is in someways even sadder the being straight up dead. Literally being kept alive by a bunch of MLG tryhards.

I wasn't aware that people just wanting fun matches from start to finish that constantly get ruined by dead beat losers that abandon minutes into a match regularly qualify them to be MLG Tryhards.

Long post above, everything i stated before still stands, and also this game crashes alot. Really fun when i get banned for something out of my control.

[Doktor Mandrake]

Falleax님이 먼저 게시:

Doktor Mandrake님이 먼저 게시:

Funny enough

My common sense (or the lack of it according to you) is the reason I play Custom Games

You do know you can leave at any time on custom games, right?

Last I checked, the custom games browser is full of nothing but garbage, if you want a normal vanilla experience, matchmaking is the best way to go so your idea isn't a solution.

Late reply but yeah I get your sentiment here and that is the only issue

I rarely play online mp games anymore, and can't say what the current MM experience is like on MCC but when I did last try it, the quitting just got so old.. if it wasn't team mates quitting it was the enemy team

But I suggested custom games because that's typically what I go to after work and stuff if I want to play with other people but only have a few hours or might have to leave suddenly

It can work with customs if you have enough friends though and can organise a time to play

I feel like the hard-core players are only thing keeping MCC alive anyway tbh.. these are old games these days which would mostly only appeal to old fans

Infinite is another choice but that's another discussion entirely as the game was kinda meh lol

[AlastairKD]

Doktor Mandrake님이 먼저 게시:

Falleax님이 먼저 게시:

Last I checked, the custom games browser is full of nothing but garbage, if you want a normal vanilla experience, matchmaking is the best way to go so your idea isn't a solution.

Late reply but yeah I get your sentiment here and that is the only issue

I rarely play online mp games anymore, and can't say what the current MM experience is like on MCC but when I did last try it, the quitting just got so old.. if it wasn't team mates quitting it was the enemy team

But I suggested custom games because that's typically what I go to after work and stuff if I want to play with other people but only have a few hours or might have to leave suddenly

It can work with customs if you have enough friends though and can organise a time to play

I feel like the hard-core players are only thing keeping MCC alive anyway tbh.. these are old games these days which would mostly only appeal to old fans

Infinite is another choice but that's another discussion entirely as the game was kinda meh lol

Infinite even 2 years later still feels like it never left beta, its an unfinished product through and through.

[Doktor Mandrake]

AlastairKD님이 먼저 게시:

Doktor Mandrake님이 먼저 게시:

Late reply but yeah I get your sentiment here and that is the only issue

I rarely play online mp games anymore, and can't say what the current MM experience is like on MCC but when I did last try it, the quitting just got so old.. if it wasn't team mates quitting it was the enemy team

But I suggested custom games because that's typically what I go to after work and stuff if I want to play with other people but only have a few hours or might have to leave suddenly

It can work with customs if you have enough friends though and can organise a time to play

I feel like the hard-core players are only thing keeping MCC alive anyway tbh.. these are old games these days which would mostly only appeal to old fans

Infinite is another choice but that's another discussion entirely as the game was kinda meh lol

Infinite even 2 years later still feels like it never left beta, its an unfinished product through and through.

Played the campaign on gamepass for £1, was fun and could see how they tried to capture that same magic from halo 1s campaign but felt flat, especially when the game launched with no co-op, no forge, nothing but that base concept

What stinged for me is that the splitscreen they WERE working on actually worked, then they just ditch it.. like they do everything splitscreen

I get it, people dont care about splitscreen anymore but they could at least give the pc version of MCC splitscreen.. I have an xbox 360 under my TV cabinet and I'm not gonna buy an xbox one or series console just to get MCC with decent framerate

I do appreciate their updates to MCC since its launch on xbox, but 343 and also Microsoft really need to do better with Halo.. it's their biggest flagship IP and Halo deserves better

[acSiegemaster]

Doktor Mandrake님이 먼저 게시:

AlastairKD님이 먼저 게시:

Infinite even 2 years later still feels like it never left beta, its an unfinished product through and through.

Played the campaign on gamepass for £1, was fun and could see how they tried to capture that same magic from halo 1s campaign but felt flat, especially when the game launched with no co-op, no forge, nothing but that base concept

What stinged for me is that the splitscreen they WERE working on actually worked, then they just ditch it.. like they do everything splitscreen

I get it, people dont care about splitscreen anymore but they could at least give the pc version of MCC splitscreen.. I have an xbox 360 under my TV cabinet and I'm not gonna buy an xbox one or series console just to get MCC with decent framerate

I do appreciate their updates to MCC since its launch on xbox, but 343 and also Microsoft really need to do better with Halo.. it's their biggest flagship IP and Halo deserves better

>its their biggest flagship IP
>biggest
>flagship

it's not the 2000's/early 2010s anymore lol. Microsoft doesn't need to care about Halo anymore.

Also campaign splitscreen had issues in Infinite and because nobody played mp splitscreen, Microsoft pulled the plug.

[Doktor Mandrake]

acSiegemaster님이 먼저 게시:

Doktor Mandrake님이 먼저 게시:

Played the campaign on gamepass for £1, was fun and could see how they tried to capture that same magic from halo 1s campaign but felt flat, especially when the game launched with no co-op, no forge, nothing but that base concept

What stinged for me is that the splitscreen they WERE working on actually worked, then they just ditch it.. like they do everything splitscreen

I get it, people dont care about splitscreen anymore but they could at least give the pc version of MCC splitscreen.. I have an xbox 360 under my TV cabinet and I'm not gonna buy an xbox one or series console just to get MCC with decent framerate

I do appreciate their updates to MCC since its launch on xbox, but 343 and also Microsoft really need to do better with Halo.. it's their biggest flagship IP and Halo deserves better

>its their biggest flagship IP
>biggest
>flagship

it's not the 2000's/early 2010s anymore lol. Microsoft doesn't need to care about Halo anymore.

Also campaign splitscreen had issues in Infinite and because nobody played mp splitscreen, Microsoft pulled the plug.

Well yeah they haven't got a single flagship tbh, I know it's not the 2000s but considering Halo and also the newest Forza Motorsport was a flop

I don't care what year it is lol.

[Corgi3699]

acSiegemaster님이 먼저 게시:

it's not the 2000's/early 2010s anymore lol. Microsoft doesn't need to care about Halo anymore.

they have gazillions of dollars i dont think they care about anything anymore. they dump money into problems or ignore it

[Yaltiaj]

Catering to the E-sports crowd has been a death blow against this franchise. The casual will always be the majority. Ignoring that fact is a bad move for business, but mismanagement seems to the speciality in regards to 343.

[itzRiceKrispies]

Kitt 🌟 Stargazer님이 먼저 게시:

itzRiceKrispies님이 먼저 게시:

As someone who has been around since CE, this franchise is on life support and that is in someways even sadder the being straight up dead. Literally being kept alive by a bunch of MLG tryhards.

I wasn't aware that people just wanting fun matches from start to finish that constantly get ruined by dead beat losers that abandon minutes into a match regularly qualify them to be MLG Tryhards.

I think I'll take the dead beats who quit & don't give the other team 20+ free kills over the scum just standing around.

Also if they would enable joining during the match we would be able to replace them. Which has been stated. Everything else u said in your OG post is either irrelevant to the debate or nonsensical.

[Kitt 🌟 Stargazer]

itzRiceKrispies님이 먼저 게시:

Kitt 🌟 Stargazer님이 먼저 게시:

I wasn't aware that people just wanting fun matches from start to finish that constantly get ruined by dead beat losers that abandon minutes into a match regularly qualify them to be MLG Tryhards.

I think I'll take the dead beats who quit & don't give the other team 20+ free kills over the scum just standing around.

Also if they would enable joining during the match we would be able to replace them. Which has been stated. Everything else u said in your OG post is either irrelevant to the debate or nonsensical.

and I'll take a reliable teammate, even if they're not the best possible teammate available over dead weight. At least I know they'll stick to the game to the very end.

When it comes to join in progress, I'll only accept that if there's a way to opt out of being placed in matches that have already started.

Also

"Personally, I feel they should make it that quitters just get lobbied with other quitters before putting them with decent human beings myself though. Include a scale system, the more you quit, the more likely you're going to be placed with other quitters. It doesn't go away with time either, you need to stop quitting in order stop being placed with quitters if it bothers you. The more you quit, the more games you need to play completely before it starts changing.

I mean, since people feel that people be allowed to quit at any given moment. Then they should have absolutely no problem playing with nothing but quitters in their matches right? They can even remove the quit ban feature entirely with this."

This bit would cater to what everyone wants.

1. People who hate quit bans will no longer be banned for quitting.
2. People that want reliable teammates will get reliable teammates.

What downside is there to this to you? You're literally having the thing your complaining about given to you. Being able to leave without the fear of being banned, while also giving people who want more reliable teammates from start to finish during matches.

Not agreeing with what I have to say does not in any way make it irrelevant to the debate or nonsensical. If you have nothing of value to add to a conversation with a comment, you'd do better off keeping your mouth shut.