Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Treat Amazon's story as a standalone rather than something strictly connected to the lore and story. It's something content wise, but it's not really your strongest source for the lore.
According to its Executive producer "the series is a standalone story that takes place within its own "Silver Timeline" that is separate from and inspired by the core canon and lore of the transmedia franchise rather than a continuation, adaptation, prequel, or sequel". (Quote taken from wikipedia.)
If you want the general lore and not John's lore (according to what I've read), Halopedia is your best source for the general story and go for the novel section first. Want more about John's story, you have to play the games unless you wanna read the rest in the wiki.
Halo Reach's ending is the start of Halo 1 so you may or may not play it. I recommend playing it since I had a fun time with the story but in the end is up to you. Halo ODST from what I remember is also a standalone since like Reach, it focuses from the point of view of your protagonist, "Rookie" while in Reach it's focused on the Noble Team's point of view.
You can also go for the novels but I'm not sure if that's what you're going for.
Basically, I want to know which halo game places the most emphasis on story, narrative and lore. I will play that one and fill my lore gaps from a fansite.
What are the full names of those titles?
Thank you
In terms of Lore there is a lot that has been changed since 343i took over so depending on where you look you will get different takes that are contradictory. If all you are interested in is the show then neither the books nor games can really help you, as the show is doing its own thing and only loosely based on the source material.
Is there a particular reason you don't want to play Halo CE? Level design gets a bit cookie cutter but game play is solid.
Secondly, just play the games in release order, don't worry about graphics because the art styles for the classic Halo games look great.
If you're talking about Halo 1, I just couldn't get over how dated the graphics looked.
I disagree. I tried the first Halo game and the graphics are extremely dated.
I don't need anything in chronological order, just a Halo game with good story that doesn't look dated from an objective standpoint.
Yeah graphics are either really old or just inappropriate. They really need to do an anniversary Take 2 for CE. The older graphics despite having lower polygon count have a better art design, new graphics color pallet and lighting are just way off.
Did you try playing with the original graphics or the new updated version? I wonder if switching between them would help, or if you already tried that I am not sure how to help you other than saying to either read the books or get past the old graphics. Fortunately Halo 2 Anniversary did a much better job with the remaster.
You know they redid the graphics for CE right? They basically brought 1 and 2 up to a bit past 3 in terms of graphics.
If it's the general lore then I would suggest you play Reach first. From my point of view, Reach is a good staging point for the lore buildup of the series. But seeing as you dislike the dated graphics then it's best for you to skip CE and just get yourself up to speed via the fansite you're talking about and Halopedia. Halo 2 seems to have decent enough graphic quality wise for you to be able to tolerate so it's generally good to play it and 3 and above looks good enough.
I'm not too sure about ODST but it may still impart enough lore for you to enjoy.
Halo Wars might also be a good game to play if you want to learn more but only if you're interested in playing RTS games.
But all in all, you can really just read throughout the Halo wiki for more lore since the games can only cover so much in the point of view of the main character. But this is be really being biased now I said it earlier and I'll say it again since I really like it. Reach is a good place to start.
I am sure that I would have fond memories if I played Halo 1 back in the early 2000s, but No, I would not be able to enjoy it at those levels of graphics if I played it for the first time today.
I did try Halo 1 from Halo MCE and it looked like look warm diarrhea and the gameplay was very still for an fps.
Particularly since I have been playing Halo Infinite and would have that as my baseline comparison.
Thank you.