Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
Topic reported.
Perfect Dark was basically the original Halo. It came out a full year before Halo. Had aliens, personal shields, cloaking devices, and a few vehicles. It's certainly in my top ten best shooters of all time.
Also Syphon Filter.
He's gonna report it anyways.
He does that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyYxfySMD_g
Just listen to this when reading it.
And remember, discussion on the discussions tab is a sin.
Praise the forerunners.
Listening to that while reading it certainly enhanced the experience.
But that would mean even more delays, and we don't want that.
Just stick to what you promised before and maybe later add it, just not delay anymore the launch because of that
Halo 5 is amazing, are you kidding? The story was ass, but the multiplayer (the main reason people play Halo in the longterm) was literally the best Halo has been. It's all the good of the equal starts Halo of old with all the movement options and improvements of a modern FPS.
Now it's just a halo collection, soooooo ofc halo 4 would be in, it was in there from the beginning, it was a legacy 360 title. I don't see your point at all.
works for me
Like, its one of the smallest straws i've seen grasped at, ever.
Reach doesnt need that justification to be in there.
Why are we so hung up on the name. It was made completely irrelevant the moment they added ODST, and good riddance too.
Its a fantastic game and 343 are doing us a solid by adding it, as opposed to selling us a remaster it doesnt need in the far future for more money.
Other people want halo 4. (Me included.) And other people want Halo 5.
Thats justification enough to add them. Get over yourselves.
Just dont buy them. They're coming out one at a time. It'll affect the other games in no way.
Relax.
Orrrr... some people actually played the game and didn't find anything they really liked about it compared to the other games? You go on to talk about how people have a bias towards Bungie's Halos and how people act like Bungie did nothing wrong, but act like Halo 4 did nothing wrong either. Kind of a double standard if you ask me.
And added a ♥♥♥♥ ton of features that don't belong in Halo games, thus further putting Halo along the path to being a mediocre modern shooter.
How did 343 improve armor abilities exactly? As far as I'm concerned, they were just as intrusive to the core gameplay and just as unbalanced and irritating as the ones in Reach. The only difference is that Reach at least had the decency of giving everyone the same set of preset loadouts instead of letting everyone customize your own loadouts ala CoD.
It's honestly not that great for Co-op either. Prometheans are just a terrible enemy to fight against. Give me any iteration of the Flood over those guys any day. It's better for Co-op because you actually have someone more competant than the AI to fire the Warthog turret, but other than that, it's about the same in terms of BS.
Most reasonable people I've seen that criticize 343's games have issues with Bungie's games too. Bungie's not perfect. They never were. Neither are 343. But there's a reason that 343's games are more critically panned by the community while Bungie's games are generally more critically praised, and it's not just nostalgia or "bandwagoning" as you claim. There are people that exist that defend everything Bungie does, but we call them "blind fanboys" for a reason.
No one's said this.
This one's completely subjective, yet you make it out to be like it's something completely objective. It's entirely based on what you personally consider "Halo", and may change from person to person. Here's some information for you: There are people that praise the OT that hate Reach. There's also people that think every game after CE completely lost touch of what made Halo so good. There's fans of all kinds. This "Bungie fan vs 343 fan" nonsense needs to stop.
And? ODST was awesome, albeit overpriced for it's initial release. Maybe you didn't like it, but that hardly constitutes Bungie "twisting what we consider 'Halo'."
And 343 gave Halo custom loadouts, killcams, enhanced mobility mechanics, ADS, QTEs, and microtransactions. They also kept AAs in Halo 4, and technically in Halo 5 in the form of the previously mentioned enhanced mobility mechanics. Just because Bungie took a misstep in their game doesn't mean 343 gets off scott free for the things they do.
See above response.
They technically were always like that, it's just Bungie didn't have the technology to throw tons of them at you until Halo 3 because engine limitations prevented them from having as many NPCs on screen at once. The Flood were made weaker to compensate for the sheer number of them in comparison to CE and 2. If they were as durable as in the previous games, you and other people would've complained that they were too bullet spongey. This is also, again, completely subjective, and in no way is an indication of how Bungie "twisted what we consider 'Halo'."
Halo Wars was alright. Halo Wars 2's story was mediocre. I don't have anything to comment on it's gameplay as I've never actually played the game proper, just seen the story. That said, I suppose you have a point here, so I'll let you have this.
And there are people in the Halo fandom that dispute this?
The Bungie that made Halo and the Bungie who made Destiny are clearly not the same group of people. Depending on the circumstances and which Bungie developed Halo 4 and 5, they could be better or worse. No point in questioning "what if" any way since that's clearly not how things turned out and is completely irrelevant to criticizing Bungie's or 343's Halo games.
So we are in agreement then.
Maybe, maybe not. Nobody knows the answer, not even you.
I'll take any of the classic Halos over either of those, thanks. Maybe give me Halo 5 Forge or Customs, but that's it.