MK11 just took down the quartering's video over Jax's ending.

[Lord Tony]

The quartering made a video about Jax's ending and it got shut down by MK11 devs.

[TruthDemon]

I did a little digging, found this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSjAlFn7zyU

Jax's character is kind of all over the place
MKX he does show to protect his family, MK9 his him building a control grid and imprisoning Kano

Deception:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCteY1Sjts

MK4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNkRvcUn6VM

MK3:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhtLY0WjH-o

MK2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2J8TJ11sJ6A

[St0rM]

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Originally posted by Lord Tony:

Uh since when can you have videos taken down for "spoilers"

If it's about unreleased material that hasn't been sanctioned by WB then they absolutely have the right to under copyright grounds.

It actually falls under the fair use exception, you have no right to take some other's transformative work down even if you own the copyright to the material. That is the only way for journalism to be legal.

[Alhazred]

Originally posted by St0rM:

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

If it's about unreleased material that hasn't been sanctioned by WB then they absolutely have the right to under copyright grounds.

It actually falls under the fair use exception, you have no right to take some other's transformative work down even if you own the copyright to the material. That is the only way for journalism to be legal.

You're right, but it's also not relevant. The original question was "since when CAN you have videos taken down for spoilers." The laws and enforcement of laws around such things are a complete joke that do not have the best interests of the vast majority of people at heart.

We can cite fair use until we're blue in the face and the answer is still going to be "since forever."

[TruthDemon]

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

See above. And there were plenty of MK11 leak vids taken down from Youtube. Dont act like this guy was specifically targeted because he wasn't.

The video in question, about the ending,was NOT taken down by WB/NRS. the uploader closed their youtube account (before you say it.. they were NOT banned either)

[TruthDemon]

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Originally posted by St0rM:

It actually falls under the fair use exception, you have no right to take some other's transformative work down even if you own the copyright to the material. That is the only way for journalism to be legal.

Only for published material. The clip falls under unpublished material and is exempt from that clause.

http://www.ivanhoffman.com/unpublished.html
"The general standard, however, is clear enough: the fair use copier must copy no more than is reasonably necessary (not strictly necessary— room must be allowed for judgment, and judges must not police criticism with a heavy hand) to enable him to pursue an aim that the law recognizes as proper, in this case the aim of criticizing the copyrighted work effectively."

Fair USE in UNPUBLISHED WORKS

[Zips]

Oh no. A clickbait fueled, misogynist, idiot YouTube reactionary got a video pulled. What ever will we do.

[SuperMeggy]

Originally posted by Lord Tony:

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Because it's a spoiler of unreleased material. Pretty standard procedure.

Uh since when can you have videos taken down for "spoilers"

You can't be serious.

[TruthDemon]

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Originally posted by Zederia:

http://www.ivanhoffman.com/unpublished.html
"The general standard, however, is clear enough: the fair use copier must copy no more than is reasonably necessary (not strictly necessary— room must be allowed for judgment, and judges must not police criticism with a heavy hand) to enable him to pursue an aim that the law recognizes as proper, in this case the aim of criticizing the copyrighted work effectively."

Fair USE in UNPUBLISHED WORKS

We've already settled this in this very thread ya dingus:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/976310/discussions/0/1681441347884346014/?ctp=3#c1681441347885560328

Hey "dingus" it says nothing abut unpublished or unreleased at all. So.. you're wrong, thanks

[Captain Murphy The Villian]

Originally posted by Zederia:

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

We've already settled this in this very thread ya dingus:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/976310/discussions/0/1681441347884346014/?ctp=3#c1681441347885560328

Hey "dingus" it says nothing abut unpublished or unreleased at all. So.. you're wrong, thanks

Is your IQ in the single digits? It literally says that in the first sentence "Another big element in determining fair use is whether the work is PUBLISHED or not."

[Putins Puppet]

It's fun to participate in a forum full of experienced copyright attorneys.

[Putins Puppet]

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Originally posted by Sofa Kingdom:

It's fun to participate in a forum full of experienced attorneys.

All I see is experienced trolls..

100% troll, this entire thread.

[JoeyBsmooth]

Originally posted by node357:

Originally posted by AutomaticRifleReborn:

Source?

It's how youtube works. 3 strikes, you're out. It's in their agreement. You like those. Go ahead and read them. The dude's livelihood comes from his channel, and he's now 1/3 of the way to having no way to pay his bills. Bit heavy-handed.

He broke the embargo , if he didn't broke the rules that strike would go away.

[TruthDemon]

"Nevertheless, it is possible for use of unpublished materials to be legally fair under certain circumstances."

Silly they give just one example. But hey, you're the lawyer, right?

[Floppy]

Originally posted by Zederia:

"Nevertheless, it is possible for use of unpublished materials to be legally fair under certain circumstances."

Silly they give just one example. But hey, you're the lawyer, right?

well considering it got taken down this probably wasnt one of those circumstances

[laughinman]

Alot of people are justifying it legally instead of morally.