Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
O I was asking people, what they are sporting.
What is it a 3mb cache and 4ghz with like 50 tdp?
Mines not to far off that @ 80 tdp, 8mb and 4.5ghz I think it was for a quad and 8 threads wasn't at all bad. Use it for Blender and Zbrush enough to justify it. I like that idea though, low TDP for a rig was kind of my goal to begin with.
Indeed! This things has proven itself, top on the line! Price vs performance is amazing.
I bought it for like 30$ brand new aswell, pretty insane. It is 3.5 GHz TDP 50-54W 3MB cache, you were pretty damn close! Oh yeah it has 2 cores and it's in Kaby Lake.
I was mostly planning on using it temporally but after it handled most of the games I played at the time I kept it for longer use.
Yup I was looking at a few of those, when planning on this build. The problem was, it didn't support a few things I needed for graphics editing. My original plan was to make a ITX travel build, I could use anywhere. For gaming it's good to hear it's doing good work, as I may look into that again someday for Lan parties. Funny to think, when they say games only need dual core dual thread they weren't lying.
still havent bothered to upgrade mine... Gonna wait till the next CPU releases and see what the options are.. 4.8ghz @ 1.290 It was such a good investment however many years ago.
Yeah man I was gonna just use it as casual machine for some emulators and work for the most part but it actually did a good job in "serious" games to the point I kept it. Like dude if you spend some time with config and maybe a little overclocking this combination of G4560 and GTX1050 can run Witcher 3 on a quite nice level what the hell.
Obviously it's far from optimal but the ratio of prize to performance still blows my mind!
I imagine ITX travel build with one of those would be pretty damn good.
I was looking at Intel again, seeing they have works towards GPUs this generation. I mean if they are aimed at mobile than so be it, though there's talk of desktop GPUs as well, being PCI-E form factor. So I am thinking maybe on the front lines of that, maybe not such a bad idea. CPU, GPU and MOBO maybe go all the way, for the first system, just to make sure support is absolute. Then again it's Intel's first GPU aim for this purpose, so it'll be interesting what they are bringing to the table weather or not I go in for it.
Can't wait to upgrade to Ryzen 3700X!
Nice I did it again, for the link.
https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/16415696
Think I need to upgrade to 32GB for my Ram. This old DDR3 is most likely killing my score, as it's a 6-6-7-21 @ I think 1866 I should be able to overclock it too. Hmm.
UserBenchmarks: Game 98%, Desk 100%, Work 77%
CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K - 100.4%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1070 - 97.8%
SSD: WD Blue 250GB - 100.7%
HDD: Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB - 93.9%
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB - 83.2%
MBD: Asus PRIME Z270-P