Mortal Kombat 11

Mortal Kombat 11

İstatistiklere Bak:
MK11 PS4 PRO looks better Then PC MAX 4K
Went to my friends house and played MK11, the PS4 PRO version looks WAY better then MK11 on my $5K 4K GSYNC 2080 ti gaming PC. It's PATHETIC. It's bad enough that it runs locked at 30 fps in krypt, cinematics, menu, etc. But for peasant consoles to get better graphics?

Lesson learn, never buying fighting games on PC EVER again. This game needs a patch NOW, to fix the 30 fps CAP period, and to release FREE 4K texture pack or better graphic pack like yesturday. This is SO SAD.
< >
80 yorumdan 31 ile 45 arası gösteriliyor
PC players are such graphic ♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
1. Don't use TAA, period

2. 4k is completely worthless if your monitor's refresh rate is lower than 75 Hz, and even then it wouldn't look that better than 2k with 144 Hz

3. 60 fps is godsent

...

But overall I agree, this is just another messy PC port. The fact that MK11 is pretty much antagonistic towards any kind of modding for a good offline time adds to the issue.
En son HoboCop tarafından düzenlendi; 23 Haz 2019 @ 23:43
HAHAHAHAHAH oh you serious brah?
1337Dude (Yasaklı) 24 Haz 2019 @ 1:50 
İlk olarak PENIS tarafından gönderildi:
1. Don't use TAA, period

2. 4k is completely worthless if your monitor's refresh rate is lower than 75 Hz, and even then it wouldn't look that better than 2k with 144 Hz

3. 60 fps is godsent

...

But overall I agree, this is just another messy PC port. The fact that MK11 is pretty much antagonistic towards any kind of modding for a good offline time adds to the issue.

1. Bad advice. TAA is fantastic at removing shimmering.

2. 4k has nothing to do with refresh rate. Higher resolution = better IQ. Refresh rate doesn't improve image quality.

3. Yes.
En son 1337Dude tarafından düzenlendi; 24 Haz 2019 @ 1:50
İlk olarak 1337MechaFührer tarafından gönderildi:
1. Bad advice. TAA is fantastic at removing shimmering
And fantastic at making everything look like a blury mess. Horrible for non-4k gaming and low refresh rate screens.


İlk olarak 1337MechaFührer tarafından gönderildi:
2. Refresh rate doesn't improve image quality
Wrong. Refresh rate is the second important thing when it comes to image quality.
2160p on 60Hz wouldn't look better than 1080p on 144Hz.
1337Dude (Yasaklı) 24 Haz 2019 @ 3:45 
İlk olarak PENIS tarafından gönderildi:
İlk olarak 1337MechaFührer tarafından gönderildi:
1. Bad advice. TAA is fantastic at removing shimmering
And fantastic at making everything look like a blury mess. Horrible for non-4k gaming and low refresh rate screens.


İlk olarak 1337MechaFührer tarafından gönderildi:
2. Refresh rate doesn't improve image quality
Wrong. Refresh rate is the second important thing when it comes to image quality.
2160p on 60Hz wouldn't look better than 1080p on 144Hz.

If you aren't gaming at 4k, you aren't doing it right.

And no, refresh rate has absolutely nothing to do with image quality. Get it into your head. Motion clarity and image quality are completely different things. 4k at 60 Hz is better than 144Hz at 1440P. I know because I have both (and the best screens of both).
En son 1337Dude tarafından düzenlendi; 24 Haz 2019 @ 3:45
İlk olarak 1337MechaFührer tarafından gönderildi:
İlk olarak PENIS tarafından gönderildi:
And fantastic at making everything look like a blury mess. Horrible for non-4k gaming and low refresh rate screens.



Wrong. Refresh rate is the second important thing when it comes to image quality.
2160p on 60Hz wouldn't look better than 1080p on 144Hz.

If you aren't gaming at 4k, you aren't doing it right.

And no, refresh rate has absolutely nothing to do with image quality. Get it into your head. Motion clarity and image quality are completely different things. 4k at 60 Hz is better than 144Hz at 1440P. I know because I have both (and the best screens of both).
I would still go for 1440p/144Hz over 4K which imo. is just a gimmick.
this is odd thread, im runnin in 3440 x 1440 and it looks great. also i have a 1060 and a i7 6700k with 16 gigs ram. Also not locked to 30 fps for me only main screen, rest of the games is 60fps
En son Dragonlord3344 tarafından düzenlendi; 24 Haz 2019 @ 5:12
This is just a necro thread. MK 11 on PC maxed out in 4K looks much better then on PS4PRO.

Also there is no benefit to going 1440p/144Hz over 4K in MK 11. You will get much better experience with 4K then with 144 HZ; since the game is obviously locked at 60 fps.
yah the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X Versions do look better
Even on MKX consoles looked better
When Noob does his fatality with the clone bursting out the body their anti aliasing on the console on pc 1080p you see jaggies the game is ported like ♥♥♥♥.
We have a QLOC and SHIVE the switch ported worked on our version
i wouldnt be shocked this is an up scaled switch version lol
Why doesn't anyone believe the OP? If he spent 5 grand and can't get it looking better than a $500 console, clearly this does not make him look good and there is no reason for him to lie about it.
I've never played it on ps4 (don't own one) but clearly this game is poorly optimized for pc
Ok i had to make few comparisons. PC maxed out vs. PS4 Pro. BTW. my screenshots are 1080p because i can't get 4K, but you will see that except for higher resolution (PS4 Pro should be around 1440p most of the time), there are no differences. I noticed that shadows and lighting (focus on the huge bug in D'Vorah stage) look better on PC. But point is 4K PC would definitely look better than PS4 Pro.

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1886

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1887

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1888

Will post few more from cinematics in a bit.
En son NeoRaider tarafından düzenlendi; 24 Haz 2019 @ 8:01
Few more:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1889

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1890

Can some of you explain now how does PS4 Pro version looks better?? I am not seeing it.
@NeoRaider Very cool. From comparisons and screenshots I've seen, overall from "best" to "worst" graphics it goes PC>Xbox One X>PlayStation 4 Pro>PlayStation 4>Xbox One>Switch .
Bunch of ignorant people in the thread.

You've seen my Scorpion research? Do you wanna ignore completely the fact that PC uses ♥♥♥♥♥♥ texture with noticable worse quality than console? Not to mention the buggy physics in the winning animation?

And it's just one example. If you dig deeper and compare actual footage from the source(not the youtube), then PC might have better resolution, but if we talk about actual asset quality, then console is definetly a winner.

İlk olarak NeoRaider tarafından gönderildi:
Few more:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1889

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/1890

Can some of you explain now how does PS4 Pro version looks better?? I am not seeing it.
Easy, the PS4 Pro blood splatter and the hair on SubZero moustache looks much better and smoother. With no edgy lines surrounding it, ruining the impression.
Oh, and if you look at SubZero hat on material texture, you can notice PS4 Pro has noticable higher quality, with more detail in the texture than on PC.

I'm not gonna pin point these changes to you if you're blind-eyed PC elitist. The difference is clear, it's just up to you to notice it and take some effort.
En son Eternal tarafından düzenlendi; 24 Haz 2019 @ 13:13
< >
80 yorumdan 31 ile 45 arası gösteriliyor
Sayfa başına: 1530 50

Gönderilme Tarihi: 24 Nis 2019 @ 2:58
İleti: 80