What is the difference between At home alone 1,2, and Final ?

[Switaly]

I thought It was just sequels but apparently its the same game ?

[Insodian]

First part, where 4 achievements, is more like demo, so there's no actual reason to play it.
Final is better version of it, has a lot of fixed things, longer (i guess full), has a LOT better graphics, characters' portraits etc.
About At home alone 2 not sure, haven't seen yet.
Yeah, ik that it's been like a month and this discuss could be already forsaken...

[Switaly]

Yeah I figured out since then but I appreciate the answer

[Tamed Delirium]

Originally posted by Insodian:

First part, where 4 achievements, is more like demo, so there's no actual reason to play it.
Final is better version of it, has a lot of fixed things, longer (i guess full), has a LOT better graphics, characters' portraits etc.
About At home alone 2 not sure, haven't seen yet.
Yeah, ik that it's been like a month and this discuss could be already forsaken...

this is actually really helpful, thank you!

[DerpBall]

Related to this question, I was wondering the same thing since it seems that the original has more backstory (drawings) in the At Home Alone II explaination guide of what happened that isn't explained in the final game, at least from what I've seen. Considering playing the other two but after spending 10 hours on the final game because I'm a dummy (couldn't get last achievement), I don't particularly want to play it if it's the exact same as in the final version.

Basically, is there any backstory missed playing the final version compared to the original and second version?