What's the optimal order of consumption for core shaper max qi items?

[Wolfguarde]

I've been wondering about this for a while. I know some increases are percentile and some are flat, but I don't know which items are which. Any min-maxers able to chip in on this?

[Galroche]

order don't matter, value will end up being the same (a very nice thing in this already complicated game). you can try it by saving, eating, reload and eating in another order.

[Nether]

Order only matters if you're trying to fill the inner cauldron in the least amount of time.

[Wolfguarde]

Originally posted by Galroche:

order don't matter, value will end up being the same (a very nice thing in this already complicated game). you can try it by saving, eating, reload and eating in another order.

That's what I originally thought was the case. However, I've seen discussion suggesting that some values aren't flat, but instead a percentage increase of the eater's total qi. There was a spreadsheet with values, but I can't seem to find it again >.>

[Galroche]

Originally posted by Wolfguarde:

Originally posted by Galroche:

order don't matter, value will end up being the same (a very nice thing in this already complicated game). you can try it by saving, eating, reload and eating in another order.

That's what I originally thought was the case. However, I've seen discussion suggesting that some values aren't flat, but instead a percentage increase of the eater's total qi. There was a spreadsheet with values, but I can't seem to find it again >.>

here you go for the link :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FuY6U9tubawNHpFmm-hkJMtnTL69QGrnuKcTaNyB3_8/edit#gid=1816275698

still pretty event wicked flux apply on the previously consumed qi item, i'll try it fast.

edit : yep wicked flux before or after result in the same value, haven't tried it with sunpill as i don't have one on hand in my testing save.

[Wolfguarde]

Hmm, ok. The info in that spreadsheet must be wrong, then, which is good to know. Thank you!

[Galroche]

Originally posted by Wolfguarde:

Hmm, ok. The info in that spreadsheet must be wrong, then, which is good to know. Thank you!

wrong where ? the % is indeed based on the max value, but apply retroactively when said value is increased. unless i missed something in the sheet that say it's not supposed to act retroactively