Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
So... Given how toxic the Kerbal brand is at the moment (quite rightfully, mind you), it seems unlikely that any established development house will be interested in the IP. Setting up an altogether new developer is a possibility as well (which is what PD did in the first place) but is likely to be a time consuming and expensive process.
The best case scenario is simply delisting KSP2 from sale. Perhaps some time far in the future the rights might be licensed out, but that would be 5+ years in the future.
KSP was only part of the sale (as far as I know). Annapurna might have been interested in other IP that they could not get on its own, and accepted that they had to buy the sour grape (KSP) along with it.
The KSP IP might get bundled up with other assets and sold on without further development, allowing Annapurna to make a profit on the sale instead of the development.
Good investors can turn bad assets into profit (see also the sub-prime mortgage crisis).
----- EDIT -----
Clarification: When I say "good investors" I meant "shrewd", not "morally good".
"a yet unnamed company made up of people who left Annapurna"
You talk about what Annapurna might do with KSP2.
Why do you think Annapurna can do anything with KSP2 or other assets of former PD, just because former employees bought it?