Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Was announced today in their discord.
3080 and 11 gen to play.
Can't say I'm surprised unfortunately, when there was so many red flags already...
who knew!
LOL !
KSP one was kinda like communism. As long as you met the min. requirements, after awhile it ran like crap no matter how good your rig. Equalization of misery.
But just how I love the what the Soviet space program accomplished in spite of that, I do love KSP 1. Including the fact it ran “ok-ish sometimes” on my aging 4690k+GTX 970.
We'll see.
Anyway these req is not proportional to visual quality of the game. There is much more detailed and beatiful game with much less requirements.
I guess we should wait until its released.
Right now this requirements sounds more like a joke.
- Devs getting scooped from original team
- Management issues
- Game being in "polishing and feature adding" since 2020
- Game announced as EA with not a single feature in 2022
- Game announced as a 50$ EA while being niche game...
Just to name a few of course.
good joke