Whats your PC Specs & FPS

[SlicedTacos]

I am wondering what people get with their pc specs, below i listed my pc specs, in order to fully understand how poorly optimized the game.

GTX 1080
i9-9900k
32gb RAM
1440p

in game settings:
1080p
All Low Settings
on launch pad 15-25fps
In space 40fps
building ships 70fps

[izibane]

Specs: Ryzen 9 7950X
Radeon 6900XT
32GB DDR5 @ 6000MT/s

Graphics: Ultra 1440p @ 144HZ

12 part ship w/ 2 engines
Launchpad: 40fps
Launching: 30fps
In space: 90-100fps
Building ships 130-144fps

[vavakado]

Intel i5-12400F
16 gb (8 X 2) @3200 mhz
RTX 3070
500gb SSD
1440p
Medium settings preset

---

70-80 in vab
40-50 on pad
20-30 when launching
5-50 in space(wtf, when 5 fps 0 GPU load)

[Shoshon The Elegant]

Ryzen 9-3900k
Radeon 6800xt
64 GB DDR @ 3600mhz
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
3440 x 1440 Display

~60 FPS on launch pad
Drops to around 20-30 on launch (Depending on size of craft and how many parts)
50+ FPS in space so far.

My issue hasnt been performance. mostly im having issues with parts not working correctly and ♥♥♥♥ just utterly breaking for no reason.

[Dridas]

Asus GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Intel i7 13700K
64GB Ram DDR5 - 5800
3440 × 1440 ( UWHD )

in Game settings:
2560x1440
All MAX
On Launch Pad 44 FPS
In Space 110 FPS
Building Ships - 82 FPS

[~* BiZZ Keryear *~]

I just realized this discussion is pointless unless it's done with the same vessel in a new safe. Or at least adding a part count.

Edit: I unsubscribed the discussion

[Betty's Honor guard]

Автор сообщения: ~* BiZZ Keryear *~

I just realized this discussion is pointless unless it's done with the same vessel in a new safe. Or at least adding a part count.

Edit: I unsubscribed the discussion

Not entirely pointless. It still provides a general sense of fps ratios depending on in-game status and between different brands. For example, having low fps in space is obviously an outlying result, looking at this thread. Furthermore, that problem has been reported by people with both Nvidia and AMD GPUs, so the GPU manufacturer can be ruled out as the determining factor. Quite useful stuff in my opinion.

[Swift~Plague]

-Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz Overclocked to 5.2ghz
-Memory: 65536MB RAM ddr4 4x sticks running at 4300mhz
---Ram timings FSB:DRAM 3:54, CAS TIMINGS 16, 19, 19, 39, 2T
-Card name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Tri-Frozr Gaming Gpu
-1x Model: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
-2x Model: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB

My system is by far not a top tier machine nor bottom tier. But i get 48-52 fps during launch with upto 12 engines firing at one time. my fps does not drop from 48-52 either at ground level or in outer space. I have gone to minmus and the mun. When in outer space or above 48km altitude i get 72-136 fps. in vab or any facilities i get 136-175fps. This is at 1080p. with maximum graphics.

I do not know nor understand how everyone is claiming the game has so little fps when the only way i got my fps to dip below 40 fps was to put 20 engines firing at one time and then zoom in on the engines and then i got 10-15 fps.

This feels, looks, and acts like bad optimizations in logic code and will prolly be fixed in near future.

[Ultime]

Автор сообщения: jessolino

2 x Intel Xeon x5675
48gb RAM
GeForce GTX970 4GB

resolution 1080
50-60 in space when not looking at planets,
10-12 when looking at planets

Using low or high graphic settings doesn't impact framerate at all for me.
And I mean everything low or everything maxed out even antialias 8x

Oh I forgot to report GPU running at 100%. That's not normal. There's no other game doing that except crappy ones like rust

GPU running at 100% (or 99%) is very normal and this is what you want, you clearly have no idea of what you are talking abou

[TeeSquar]

Автор сообщения: yezze^

RTX 3080 TI
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
64 GB RAM 3600Mhz
3840 × 2160 ( 4K )

in Game settings:
4K
All MAX
On Launch Pad 45-60
In Space 60
Building Ships over 90

Similar FPS results except running on 1440.
i9 10850K oc'd w/ 32G ram RTX3070Ti 8G

Built it for MSFS which runs great, so I knew KSP2 should be okay. Once they patch the performance, it'll be super.

[LeroyJenkins]

Alienware R14
Windows 11 – 64bit
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 3.40 GHz
RAM: 128 GB
Nvidia RTX3090 24GB
3840x2160 @ 60fps solid across all modes of game
All Game Graphics settings on MAX

[Ultime]

Автор сообщения: TeeSquar

Автор сообщения: yezze^

RTX 3080 TI
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
64 GB RAM 3600Mhz
3840 × 2160 ( 4K )

in Game settings:
4K
All MAX
On Launch Pad 45-60
In Space 60
Building Ships over 90

Similar FPS results except running on 1440.
i9 10850K oc'd w/ 32G ram RTX3070Ti 8G

Built it for MSFS which runs great, so I knew KSP2 should be okay. Once they patch the performance, it'll be super.

i have 5800x, 3080ti and 32 gig ram and playign on 1440p res
i have 14-35 fps on launch pad.
i would believe that some thread on the cpu is running 100% and slowing everything down , that would explain why people like you having similar setup and better cpu get more fps ( event at higher RES), also considering my gpu utulisation is not close to 99%.

[U3b3]

CPU : Ryzen 7900 ( non X )
GPU : 6800 XT
32 GB DDR5 Ram @6000Hz
1920x1080

Ingame Settings All Max

Launch Pad : 31-46 FPS
in Space : 95-135 FPS
Building : 120-144 FPS (

[Pythonchess]

Ryzen 5 4600H
GTX 1660 Ti
8Gb 3200Mhz

All low settings
60fps in the VAB
60 on the pad
20-30 at launch
60 in space

[Auger]

Win 11 64
CPU I7-12700KF 3.60 GHZ
Ram 32 gb
GPU RTX3080
Resolution 2560X1440

Max settings
Launchpad 59 FPS
In space 40 80 FPS
VAB 115 FPs

This was with the Kerbal K2 stock rocket 48 parts

[edit]
Just for fun switched to 1080p and low settings and the framerate was about the same. Just a couple more FPS

[Hatchet Jack]

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
RAM 32GB
1080p

Medium Settings
on launch pad 38fps
launching rocket 20fps
in space 70fps
in space looking towards Kerbal 30fps
VAB 55fps

drop an additional 10fps for each when settings are on high