安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I mean, I agree about your last part. The game was a pretty disappointing remake in a lot of aspects imo. It's still a decent game, but as a remake of RE3 it fails horribly.
It actually is possible to think upskirt panty shots would be out of place in a game without being sensitive or triggered or puritan or anything negative.
Directors aren't prudes for choosing not to include those elements in their projects, the overwhelming majority of media doesn't include upskirt panty shots and adult entertainment still booms.
There were no intentional upskirt panty shots in the original so nothing was cut in that sense of the game being a remake/reimagining.
The only sensitive people I have seen be outraged at this change are the ones who want their panties back.
And before it comes up, I'm very pro-adult entertainment and literally work in the field so that isn't the reason for my feelings.
Jill's skort just doesn't hurt this game in reality the way it has offended people in their fantasy realms.
Would you people be happy if the skirt was a skirt but the cutscenes and in-game camera wouldn't let you peek up it during gameplay? Not if they made that change now, of course that would outrage you, but if it was like that way at launch. If you say you'd have no problem with that, then there's really no issue. I'd agree that would be very faithful to the original game.
But if you just wanna see her panties that's totally okay I got news for you you can do that on the internet.
Just... y'all don't have to invent enemies to rage against in a vacuum as being responsible for ruining your vidya. It is going to be okay, I promise.
Yeah there is an interesting Twitter thread you can find from a game dev basically making the point that since the textures of the full body scans can't be accessed in-game it was more efficient for the devs to just leave the base textures intact and work on something else, pretty much.
These aren't the days of "Hot Coffee" where inaccessible content can get a game banned unless some adventurous devs out there really want to cross a line with their hidden files for controversy's sake.
Right.
And I'm sure you work in the adult entertainment industry. I got an uncle who works in capcom too. And he said this was for puritanical reasons.
This is the least relevant thing I said and doesn't have an impact on my statements at all other than going out of my way to provide some context for my feelings on the subject matter at large outside of this game.
If that's all you have issue with then I think we're good here, it's no skin off my back.
(And P.S., no I'm not claiming to be an actor, I'm involved in the writing and production side of things.)
I miss when this was the ridiculous thing people were actually offended about being covered. It was the same people with the same arguments but was definitely more visibly ridiculous to outsiders.
Getting outraged at censorship isn't sensitive.
Here's an example of the sensitive players capcom didn't want to offend.
It's not censorship though? There aren't any panty shots in the game that they chose to censor, you can't censor something that never existed. Them not making the game as sexy as you would like isn't censorship. Capcom deciding the direction they wanted to go with the character's design isn't censorship.
Not every change is censorship. Wanted to make a design appeal to a larger audience as a bid to increase sales is not censorship. No one made them do this but themselves.
This game has more violent content, language, and suggestive situations (Drain Deimos, obviously) than the original by every metric, even if the gore is toned down from the previous remake (likely due to performance issues, it looks like).
I would have liked to see a skirt option too, it appeals to a sense of nostalgia of course. I'm just not particularly upset that it is a skort instead. It doesn't herald anything larger or spell doom for gamer culture. They just thought it wouldn't make the game as appealing if the camera was zooming right up Jill's skirt every time she had to crawl under something. Yes, I agree that they could have just chosen different camera direction and kept the more nostalgic outfit.
Less offended and more confused I guess. I'm trying to find the conspiracy against gamers, media, and males and I can't find it. I'm looking for the censorship equivalent to any titles that actually are censored upon release or based on region but I just can't find it. I just see trends shifting over time, as they've done before and shall continue.
It's not an attack on you. You're going to be okay.
Edit for edit: That Nate Crowley article is one person's take on the situation. Do you... do you think he and people like him have the power to shift Capcom's direction with their little blog posts? Are you conflating all people who disagree with you or are at the least okay with Jill and the game as a whole as agreeing with him? I'd be willing to bet most people who don't agree with you would also find his article pretty funny.
If it is that easy for someone writing negatively about a subject to change development trends people like you should have the world reflecting your views in no time.
Self-censorship is a form of censorship. Controlling what you say or do in order to avoid offending others.
When you look at how capcom has self-censored their games before so people don't get offended, and you have a lot of video game journalists complaining about females being too sexy in games and that it teaches men not to respect women, and capcom and other games like mk11 suddenly tones down the female sex appeal in their games, then it is very likely that game journalists are influencing capcom to self-censor.
Once you start to legitimize that "sexy female outfits in games causes men to not respect women and become "misogynists" then "violence and gore in games makes people violent and become murders" will follow.
I've never said here that her having a different outfit would be less respectful towards women. I really haven't seen many people here say that at all, definitely a minority. I HAVE seen a lot of people here using manufactured outrage at Jill to dog whistle misogyny, though.
Everyone controls what they say around others, it's a basic communication skill. I'm not sure why you are couching the concept of having some consideration towards others as a bad thing here. Clearly Capcom didn't do a good job, people like you have been plenty offended at these changes. Hopefully they can make more people happy in the future.
Tight jeans and a crop top are decently attractive and a tube top and shorts is a fairly sexy look as well. I'm not sure why you think her panties not being visible is a full stop on Jill being a sexy and attractive character. No one complained that she wasn't sexy enough in RE1 even though Capcom made the choice to give her pants instead of Lara Croft tactical shorts. Is RE1 censored because they could have made it sexier but didn't? That's exactly what happened here: they could have made the game sexier but they didn't. Case closed. I'm very sorry. I can link you to some mods or browser searches if you need more from your Jill to be happy.
Your censorship argument would hold more water if, you know... they actually censored anything in this game. "Change I don't like" =/= censorship.