Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said, I certainly don't get the AD's motivation (assuming it's his doing out of personal reasons) and I also struggle to see how this could've been planned by him or whoever, since so much had to be "improvised" in the scenes. Even if Andy was instructed to place the gun in that particular locker, Logan would have had to be previously told to retrieve it from there, but the whole thing where Dylan tells him to leave it on the floor and Andy later picking it up was all on the spot. I can't see the AD being THAT calculating and having thought of all of those possibilities in advance. And also everything working out that smoothly.
But then again, this confused me as much as it did you, so there may well be something I've missed.
That's how I ultimately figured it out, but even after I wrote the answer down (AD > Andy > Logan > Andy), I didn't even bother putting it in because I assumed the real answer was AD > Andy > ? > Logan > Andy. I was just **absolutely convinced** there was no possibility of Andy acting like a complete alien and leaving his gun in a separate locker from the rest of his stuff. So I ended up watching Andy's entire track and thinking maybe Bill stole it instead (even though it's obvious Andy gets the gun from the floor), but then I could never trace something back from Bill to Andy, so I was stumped. I ended up throwing in my "incomplete" answer out of pure frustration thinking that there was nothing else that would work and was legitimately stunned to see it was "correct."
If all went according to plan and everyone had been given a prop gun (or, in Andy's case, the real gun), it wouldn't have been an issue. But the moment the AD tells Bill to get Andy's gun, he's sentencing someone to death that he can't foresee because the AD *shouldn't* know that the gun in Locker 3 is fake. Or if he does know that the gun in Locker 3 is fake, the AD is omnipotent. It's just wild.
That D is the same person of this big D. This is why the AD murdered big D.
First of all, Andy and the AD are likely to be a group. The AD gave him a real gun and a fake gun.
In the reality show script, the director designed the exchange of two pistols, so the AD designed a second pistol exchange in order to finally let Andy get the real gun.
At the beginning, Andy secretly changed Logan's fake gun into a real gun in Locker 1, and then put his fake gun in Locker 3.
The AD didn't give the gun to john,so Bill took away the fake gun in Locker 3 and gave it to john, and the real gun in Locker 1 was thrown to the ground after being taken away by Logan. Finally, Andy picked it up and shot...
If the director didn't designed the exchange of two guns in the script,this story will be much simpler.
The AD planned all this, found the murderer big D, found Andy to act and kill, found a retired real gun, used the director's play, all for revenge for his girlfriend's dies.
And afterwards, he can explain it as an accident like failure of the props group, to escape the charge of murder.
And Andy, he may not be a good actor, but a good killer.It's truly incredibleXD
Due to the language barrier, it's hard for me to explain to you. I'm sorry.
Thank you sooo much for this explanation! Just finished Lethal Script and was super confused about what the deal was with AD. I'm assuming the other commenters here are like me and we unfortunately can't play the other DLC due to the language barrier.
I agree with all of this - the part that makes everything make sense is when you realize Andy must have been secretly given two guns at the start by the AD - not only one prop gun
The AD put 2 guns in the locker room. The one Andy eventually used on Big D, but also the one that Bill took out. Someone was always supposed to take both guns. In fact, 5 people were supposed to be using guns, and at least 2 of them were supposed to be getting them from the locker room.
Big D had his all along, and so did Dylan, right? So the other three were supposed to be shared between Logan, John, and Andy. So it's kind of possible that someone else was supposed to be shot, but due to the changes in the lineup, Big D got shot instead.
it's definitely hinted that the AD's ex is the reason for the shooting, but we don't really get enough info to determine who was involved in her disappearance or how that happened, so we can't know for sure it involved Big D. It's possible he was the target all along, but considering 2 other people could've just as easily had this gun, and a bunch of last minute changes were made, there's definitely a chance he was not the real target.
I think we're missing a piece of information here because otherwise, it doesn't make sense why Andy would swap his and Logan's guns in the lockers.
If AD had given the gun to Bill like he was supposed to, it would still have ended up shooting Big D. through Bill > May > John. Because he gave the gun to Andy, Bill had to go and fetch the gun from Andy's locker which just adds an extra step to the Bill > May > John chain of the real gun owners. However, at this point, Andy had swapped the real gun with Logan's fake gun in the lockers without any reason or explanation. Even if he had secret instructions to swap, why would anyone give him those instructions if the result was going to be the same (with the only small difference being who pulled the trigger)?
I occasonally check discussions for this game because I really liked it. I've seen and participated in silmiliar discussion abot guns here: https://steamcommunity.com/app/942970/discussions/0/4512129484685441450/#c4512129903359071958 you can check the tread for some extra details
I thnk that initial plan didn't need any gun swaps. It was very simple:
But actor playing Andy was a rookie, it's stated in the Director-AD dialohue. We can also see how he makes mistakes under pressure, just watch him run in the finale - runs in wrong direction, overshoots the exit, mistimes his "heroic" jump.
So swap was a honest human mister of the actor plating Andy. There was a fake gun inside Logan's locker from the begining. It makes sense inside the script - Logan owns a gun, he shot Big D after a failed deal. Logan also goes straight to his locker after hearing details about him shooting Big D and there is no line like "Oh my, where did this gun come from, that convinient", he just grabs it and goes to shoot/treaten Vincent and Lisa.
And the whole swap went like this:
Thank you for explaining, it does make sense that Andy would panic and and make sense within the logic of the story. I still think it was hard to deduce this out without any direct clues, it would have helped if Andy hinted at this, for example, in a monologue while he was alone in the toilet (this would also be a nice pay off for listening to that room's recording which was pretty useless otherwise). Thanks again!
I think AD intentionally forgot to give John a gun. The easiest way to sneak the real gun on set was through Andy, who is established not to be the most astute person. That way, when John is missing a gun, the scene could play out as is, and in that scenario, John would have ended up with the real gun. The fact that John says, “Wait. This is fa—” led me to believe John was expecting it to be real.
What AD didn’t plan was Andy screwing up and accidentally going to the wrong locker first. That’s how the guns got swapped and Logan ended up with it. But Andy shooting Big D panned out as well, as Andy could feign plausible deniability.
I just don’t think AD would have trusted Andy to work with him, only to use him as a pawn.
Out of all of the responses here, this one feels the most like what the developers probably actually intended to me. It actually makes sense with all of the setup and comments. All of the other suggestions require ignoring some of the details we get and if there is anything this game does, it is to make sure everything you hear matters in some way.