Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also look at cases like Inca & Quechua (where they had to change some names and stats around to turn the native settlement into a full civ., while retaining the native settlement).
My point is that even if Forgotten Empires could have the maximum number of civilizations at 32 it would be a stretch to have that many considering half of them would be locked behind dlc at that point and this might also help explain why the dlc for Danish and Polish is slow to come out for 2024. Also, would the tech tree have to be reworked if Persians/Omani were to added to AoE III: DE? A number of problems might get in the way the more civilizations Forgotten Empires adds to this game. I already mentioned Omani and Persians as possible new civs for adding (although, I am not sure what they would have for buildings, tech tree, and units) which Asian (three) and African (two) civs are overall severely lacking on AoE III: DE which eventually at some point Forgotten Empires might have to add more African, Asian, and/or Native American civs as well that specifically stand out as being unique enough to be added officially to this game.
Simon Bolivar might be an interesting personality, but Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Panama, and Bolivia who helped gain independence from Spain are all small countries as well. Reason why I did not mention any of those countries. Argentina had a fight for independence and civil wars with their leader maybe could be José de San Martín. Brazil's history is a bit more complicated because it became independent apparently from tensions in Portugal instead of Brazil from the Liberal Revolution of 1820. I would love to see Brazil added officially to this game, but I am not sure how or when they ever will get added. Even if they were to have a leader personality (probably Pedro II from 1831-1889) I am not sure what they would have for a historical battle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Revolution_of_1820
Simon Bolivar (plus maybe middle-eastern and eastern-European counterparts) would be an AI personality who starts as one of the standard civilizations, but is (nearly) guaranteed to revolt to one of the appropriate nations.
This isn't to say they should never go for new main civ's, but that this would be something that works with the existing content.
From a more realistic approach in adding more official civs Brazil, Argentina, Persians, and Omani definitely make perfect sense, but you are correct on your last sentence. Even though there is enough information online about these countries/empires during this time period (which were the four I mentioned earlier) where they could be added officially to AoE III: DE the complex tech tree does complicate things as well.