Back4Blood vs World War Z

[haris_fsk]

Better Game Overall?

[DAWN OF THE DEAD]

wwz is objectively worst and boring, same goes for the movie

[b0nkerz]

War z is for broke bich

[Doomvora]

They both have their strengths and weaknesses, one does better than the other in certain areas, really depends on what you're looking for in the game of choice.

[Hokum85]

Having much more fun with B4B (for me WWZ Aftermath feels like a mobile game clumsily trying to be a zombie shooter). But like Doomvora said, it depends on what you are looking for.

[BigCheese]

Originally posted by TheCaptainGhost:

wwz is objectively worst and boring, same goes for the movie

Fact check: True

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

WWZ was re-released with significant improvements. Some of these comments must be for the old version. WWZ Aftermath is an amazing game now in 1st person. In some ways better than B4B. If I had to choose, I think WWZ is fundamentally better with more replay value. The singleplayer option includes full progression.

[Apox]

wwz has better design and more replayability had 0 motivation in b4b to play a map more then once they should looked more in other games what they do and just do it better instead tryn to catch all l4d fans an cashgrab them with hope

[icardias]

Wwz for me have better pacing , huge and beatiful maps, for me b4b have so short levels that i was wtf is that ?? , Feels like the game was rushed, and at least in wwz you choose a class and you know what to expect vs a random card system that you dont know how many hours you need to play to get good builds/cards