Back 4 Blood or World War Z: Aftermath

[Painkiller]

I want to hear you opinion which one is better quality zombie game.
I will just buy one.
Thanks

[DAWN OF THE DEAD]

B4B

[Myta]

I've only played one, and that's Back 4 Blood, so with my experience of what I've been able to physically play I'd say Back 4 Blood

[KUMAN]

wwz

[Dragontoast]

If you want "zombie" zombies game get WWZ. The zombies collide with each other and even build mounds out of themselves to climb. They also act like traditional dumb zombies.

If you want the better game B4B for sure no question, but if you want atmosphere and cinematic experience of zombie films get WWZ.

[Ki11s0n3]

B4B. WWZ is the worst game I have ever played. I got it for free on Epic and still regret playing it. Only thing the game did good was the Hordes. Other than that the game is really bad. Even playing it coop didn't make it better.

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Get gamepass.
Play both for $10.
WWZ Aftermath is a lot cheaper and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

B4B has better gunplay.
Overall gameplay loop is worse I feel but it still fun.

[Mixue Pizza]

WWZ just so boring. Played for couple hours and I dropped it.

[Dakuwan]

B4B for sure.

[IceWallowCome]

B4B

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

I will get both since WWZ Aftermath will now be 1st person.

[darkbel]

wwz 1 was good especially for free on egs)) so I wait aftermath on egs for free too
B4B will be free like other project from this devs which called Evolve
so I advice you to save money and wait till it all be free)))

[Víєгα Ɍόѕє]

As much as I enjoyed WWZ what I don't like is that this developers Track Record isn't the greatest. It took them nearly a year to add to the game and by then the playerbase had dropped off pretty hard. I can't speak on B4B yet because I dont know what TRS has planned which I wish they would do a Roadmap so at least we had an some glimpse into the future of the games updates and all that.

[Joe, aka. The Man]

WWZ is awesome. Also has good reviews. B4B had mixed reviews before the devs removed the reviews page.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Joe Erotic:

WWZ is awesome. Also has good reviews. B4B had mixed reviews before the devs removed the reviews page.

But those were beta reviews. Some of which never planned to buy the game. You could also only play part of one act which was out or order. I wouldn't put weight on those reviews.

[(N☆G) Jackal ★JJ★]

Originally posted by TheBlasterMaster™:

Originally posted by Joe Erotic:

WWZ is awesome. Also has good reviews. B4B had mixed reviews before the devs removed the reviews page.

But those were beta reviews. Some of which never planned to buy the game. You could also only play part of one act which was out or order. I wouldn't put weight on those reviews.

To add to this.
WWZ never released on Steam and have really mixed reviews too.

https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/world-war-z PC
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/world-war-z PS
https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/world-war-z Xbox

IGN gave it 7.4
Metacritic general score was 7.0
PC Gamer gave it 60%

I dont agree with these views personally as I thoroughly enjoyed WWZ, but that post from that user is not accurate what so ever and we are comparing a FULL game release to a beta release.