Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Since they have 300m of range at 100m they have significant bonuses to accuracy. An extreme example is consider your AT guns hit rate at 1500m vs 500m.
300m to 100m is going to be +100% accuracy from my understanding, at the absolute minimum it's +50%
Let alone the fire rate issue. MP-44 squads are supposed to be a solid cqc unit yet the rifle is nerfed below their line unit smg?
In light forest a dozen tests where the PPSH's had to close they lost all 10 models without taking a single model off the 10 and 9 man MP-44 squads in skijager.
MP-44s are strong enough to terrorize line infantry in dense forest, and CQC infantry trying to do anything but hold a dense forest.
As for M1 Carbines, they literally have half the damage, 2/3 the fire rate, and half the suppression values. https://imgur.com/a/Ef5BLMd