Rosselsprung tips

[Name]

Any tips on how to play this division successfully in 10v10? I’m having a tough time with the infantry card choices. I felt like Kadetten should perform like a jr Maro squad but in deep forests I find they run out of ammo in their magazines too quick and undergo a painfully slow reload cycle.

[Shortpower]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Początkowo opublikowane przez DasaKamov:

Sorry to hear about your skill issues. :b

C-Divisions like Rosselsprung are ment to hold their ground throughout Phase A, and launch their counter-offensive in Phases B and C when their most powerful units are available in number.

Their most powerful units? this is a division who's tanks max out at 25 points and does not field a gun stronger than the single battalion of 75mm pak guns (which will be required for use in phase A).
Can you explain to everyone how a division which is severely lacking in many of the game's fundamentals (armor and armor piercing) is not an inherently weaker division than divisions which do not lack those same fundamentals?

The LG42 is literally one of the best field guns, and your support tab is cheap enough to comfortably fit it.

[Mr Cheese73]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Początkowo opublikowane przez DasaKamov:

Sorry to hear about your skill issues. :b

C-Divisions like Rosselsprung are ment to hold their ground throughout Phase A, and launch their counter-offensive in Phases B and C when their most powerful units are available in number.

Their most powerful units? this is a division who's tanks max out at 25 points and does not field a gun stronger than the single battalion of 75mm pak guns (which will be required for use in phase A).
Can you explain to everyone how a division which is severely lacking in many of the game's fundamentals (armor and armor piercing) is not an inherently weaker division than divisions which do not lack those same fundamentals?

"only 1 card of pak 40s" *looks at most romanian divisions that get 1 Resita card*
You honestly only ever need 1 pak 40, you also have a card of Pak 38s which are still really good. As for tanks the Rossel tanks aren't bad for their roll. No ♥♥♥♥ a 20 point interwar tank is gonna lose to a Konigs at 2K but you're an infantry deck you fight in cities. The tanks are really good because enough armor to ignore AT rifles and good infantry scaring weapons. A division isn't just rated by "hee hee hoo what's its strongest tank?"

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Mr Cheese73:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Their most powerful units? this is a division who's tanks max out at 25 points and does not field a gun stronger than the single battalion of 75mm pak guns (which will be required for use in phase A).
Can you explain to everyone how a division which is severely lacking in many of the game's fundamentals (armor and armor piercing) is not an inherently weaker division than divisions which do not lack those same fundamentals?

"only 1 card of pak 40s" *looks at most romanian divisions that get 1 Resita card*
You honestly only ever need 1 pak 40, you also have a card of Pak 38s which are still really good. As for tanks the Rossel tanks aren't bad for their roll. No ♥♥♥♥ a 20 point interwar tank is gonna lose to a Konigs at 2K but you're an infantry deck you fight in cities. The tanks are really good because enough armor to ignore AT rifles and good infantry scaring weapons. A division isn't just rated by "hee hee hoo what's its strongest tank?"

I like how the only comparison you make is between 20pt interwar tanks and King Tigers as if thats the complaint being leveled lol. As per usual nothing but dishonesty. Keep coping maybe youll overturn the executive orders lmao.
Romanians were given the racial ability of superhuman reload speeds, kind of on the nose to give the Romanians, a people stereotyped as dexterous pickpockets, a racial ability giving their pak gun crews a substantially faster reload. Not what would i would have done but w/e,

[DasaKamov]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Romanians were given the racial ability of superhuman reload speeds, kind of on the nose to give the Romanians, a people stereotyped as dexterous pickpockets, a racial ability giving their pak gun crews a substantially faster reload.

Weird race-baiting conspiracy theory.

Which also makes zero sense, because the Romanian Pak 40 AC has the *exact same fire rate* as every other Pak 40 in the game.

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez DasaKamov:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Romanians were given the racial ability of superhuman reload speeds, kind of on the nose to give the Romanians, a people stereotyped as dexterous pickpockets, a racial ability giving their pak gun crews a substantially faster reload.

Weird race-baiting conspiracy theory.

Which also makes zero sense, because the Romanian Pak 40 AC has the *exact same fire rate* as every other Pak 40 in the game.

Its not a conspiracy or a theory and Romanians are not a race. The Resita should not fire faster than other 75mm guns.

[Mr Cheese73]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

I like how the only comparison you make is between 20pt interwar tanks and King Tigers as if thats the complaint being leveled lol. As per usual nothing but dishonesty. Keep coping maybe youll overturn the executive orders lmao.
Romanians were given the racial ability of superhuman reload speeds, kind of on the nose to give the Romanians, a people stereotyped as dexterous pickpockets, a racial ability giving their pak gun crews a substantially faster reload. Not what would i would have done but w/e,

I compare the KT because it's what all wehraboos love and enjoy so they ignore literally every other tank in the game. It's also because the KT and the French tanks you're talking about are polar opposites, helps prove the point more.
Odd flex that you'd decide to just send a stray to Romanians? I haven't seen anything indicating Romanians just have faster reload ingame so if you can dredge up any files for proof I'd love to see em

[Name]

KT is over rated and not cost efficient. Only new players use it. Skilled players use jagdpanther or elefant and have more return on investment in game.

Soon allied tanks will be getting popped by the sk18. Can’t wait

[Mr Cheese73]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Name:

KT is over rated and not cost efficient. Only new players use it. Skilled players use jagdpanther or elefant and have more return on investment in game.

Soon allied tanks will be getting popped by the sk18. Can’t wait

mostly agree, in a 1v1 a KT is absolute dogwater. costing 3 minutes of your income to suppress maybe 1/3 of the map while ur opponent probably invested in other stuff during that time sucks. It's pretty ok in 10v10 since bad players can just rely on their teammates to cover for em. That said ♥♥♥♥♥♥ Axis mains/ wehraboos still use KTs for some reason and the ncry when it gets bazookad after sitting in a city for 5 minutes

[Name]

The accuracy is just trash for me to justify using it. Vet 1,2,3 doesn’t matter misses more shots than lands and I don’t feel justified in the way current dmg mechanics work with tanks and hp to bring it in. It does sort of act as a “shield” allowing for other players tanks to not be fired upon.

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Mr Cheese73:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

I like how the only comparison you make is between 20pt interwar tanks and King Tigers as if thats the complaint being leveled lol. As per usual nothing but dishonesty. Keep coping maybe youll overturn the executive orders lmao.
Romanians were given the racial ability of superhuman reload speeds, kind of on the nose to give the Romanians, a people stereotyped as dexterous pickpockets, a racial ability giving their pak gun crews a substantially faster reload. Not what would i would have done but w/e,

I compare the KT because it's what all wehraboos love and enjoy so they ignore literally every other tank in the game. It's also because the KT and the French tanks you're talking about are polar opposites, helps prove the point more.
Odd flex that you'd decide to just send a stray to Romanians? I haven't seen anything indicating Romanians just have faster reload ingame so if you can dredge up any files for proof I'd love to see em

"wehraboos"
who?
"literally ignore every other tank"
You are having a conversation with yourself at this point.

Would Rosselsprung be stronger/easier or the same if they had a regiment of Panthers/PzIVs?
The Resita, I thought you played the game?

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Name:

KT is over rated and not cost efficient. Only new players use it. Skilled players use jagdpanther or elefant and have more return on investment in game.

Soon allied tanks will be getting popped by the sk18. Can’t wait

Skilled players are not using tank destroyers to fight soft targets.

[GhostAirship034]

*sigh*
They're at it again.

[DasaKamov]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Skilled players are not using tank destroyers to fight soft targets.

No one said they were.

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez DasaKamov:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Odysseus:

Skilled players are not using tank destroyers to fight soft targets.

No one said they were.

then the implication is Tiger IIs were being used to fight tanks, this is not their sole role.

[Odysseus]

Początkowo opublikowane przez GhostAirship034:

*sigh*
They're at it again.

*le sensible bystander*
*le sigh*