Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I am someone who enjoys building decks even if I never play them. For burning baltics allies divisions I never went once "Ah nice", "interesting". The axis divisions are much more dynamic with new interesting units compared to the allied divisions who bring nothing new to the table and even then I would rather play the old existing divisions than what we have in burning baltics, they are that much boring and uninteresting in every way.
If I had a choice I would had paid only for axis divisions for this DLC.
The problem with that premiss is only one:
More than half of the community wont buy the DLC and the map DLC will split the communty with base game maps and DLC maps.
Look, SD already have a small community and we dont need more split between gameplay stuff.
Eugen need different ideas and approach to make money with SD, but money from maps is a no-no.
For example there were much more Bs3 than KTs but only one division gets it whereas multiple divisions have access to KTs for Germans.
Edit I am not saying to remove anything from axis but rather to add into the allies.
If you like being restricted in infantry just play vyborg and you get an extra card of is-2
all the f-22 and su-76 in 19th are locked to b
+1