Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, they arent going to remove it just to please one salty boi on steam lol
I still play games from the 80s/90s, so it's very plausible.
Exactly :)
I'm not salty, i'm just Pro-Consumer rights
And Denuvo is Anti-Consumer, i guess you little boy aren't old enough to know the fiasco around SecuROM (The same guys who are behind Denuvo) and other DRM's from that time and theirfor don't know the history, i know the history, i've learned from it, that's why i'm against Hard DRM's like Denuvo and Anti-consumer policy in general.
Men, what did the mainstream did to the gaming industry? People defending Anti-consumers... sheehs... that's worse than some fictional stuff from the books of old days.
I still play games from the early 80/90's and plenty of other people do it aswell.
(And some of those really old DRM's that has been a plague, refuse to work on newer systems, leaving you without the possibility to run old games on modern machines because the Old DRM isn't compatible unless you can find a crack for it or if a company like GOG takes care of it)
Not everyone is spoiled like the majority of the so called "Modern Gamers"
IF people wouldn't be interested into playing Old Games, a Platform like GOG would have never made it.
Can't think through nor to the end these people of today...
It also has been confirmed that Denuvo also can have some slight impact on performance, this has proven meanwhile often enough. Even by official sites.
Also a small minority of players are having technical issues because of denuvo.
But some of their issues has never been fixed, because it was simply not WORTH the Cost to take care of the problems of a minority, when the majority didn't had problems at all.
I repeat, "Can't think through nor to the end these people of today..."
After this Long time with Denuvo.
Everyone who purchased Anno 1800's deserve the right that Denuvo get's removed, because it fullfilled already it's purpose, and is now nothing than just a burden for the future of this Game itself. (Denuvo won't exist forever)
And the Game itself is simply tooo Good, to die a terrible death on the future just because of the DRM Denuvo.
If you simply cannot understand this and still wanna defend this sort of practice and anti-consumer policy behaviour, i'll have nothing more to say than what Albert Einstein used once to say about humans.
There's a non negligible consideration that some fraction of the industry is using Denuvo as a way to artificially add planned obsolescence to their games, which is all the more deplorable that building a product to fail is an actual engineering design consideration injected by marketing and not a conspiracy theory. When producers of durable goods must compete with previous generations of their own products, firms can engage in planned obsolescence to limit the scope of this competition. This tends to be confirmed by publishers keeping Denuvo in their games when it has been available to pirates for years making the customer the only likely target of the middleware.
Ubisoft, for instance, recently tried to effectively remove games from their customer's library before quickly walking it back as a "misunderstanding" when put in front of a quickly rising backlash. Meanwhile SEGA kept Denuvo on several games for which they (mistakenly?) released the Denuvo-free executable themselves, meaning there's factually zero piracy prevented while they seemingly still pay for the middleware's recurrent fees. The latest example of that being Ghostwire adding Denuvo after the sales dried up.
Sometimes, it's simply the result of a single executive in denial with a hair trigger on the "You're fired" button... Hell will freeze over when the CFO or CTO dares entering the shark tank of business meetings to tell that they wasted a cold millon or two on a middleware for no return on investment. Piracy is too much of a convenient scapegoat.