Deadside

Deadside

View Stats:
Aug 23, 2024 @ 10:43am
4
Raiding: New Server Options
Progress update on our raiding improvements

View full event information here:
https://steamcommunity.com/ogg/895400/announcements/detail/4240788773948508490
< >
Showing 1-15 of 111 comments
DarkMyrlok Aug 23, 2024 @ 10:46am 
Рейды должны быть разрешены всегда. Это логично и интересно
KIRIN STRONG Aug 23, 2024 @ 10:51am 
2
1
How about you leave it the way it is?
I read something about turrets, where's that idea?
UnikPære851 Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:01am 
Can you guys not keep ur focus on the vehicle update? And push that out, while a solution to the raiding system is being developed? I just want cars in the game...
Also what's the point of 3 options? It's just unnecessary. There is around 5 players in your community that would want option 1, while everyone else wants option 3. Just implement option 3, and give us cars!!!
Last edited by UnikPære851; Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:06am
Max Mozin Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:01am 
Lol. Just like all the other games! You guys are really creative :D
Lynch91 Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:02am 
Just do it as a toggle function for community servers then you get a balance for both players for/against raiding it'll be the most easy system to implement giving community owners the choice of anytime raiding or token raiding.
HÃŤĘÐ Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:02am 
If it can’t be left the way it is with online only by tokens. I’d say decaying bases can be raided to force ppl to to run them accounts.
dingoscream Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:04am 
I just think that with these changes there won't be online raids anymore at all which is one of the super fun parts of the game.
jgcogs Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:04am 
Raiding on decaying bases sounds perfect.
Marco_PT Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:04am 
2
3
1
Devs you are id#ot or what? you ask the comunity, comunity says NO OFFLINE RAID NO RAID DECAY, but you keep pushing that BS, dont kill the damn game, leave the base raid as is, leave the base with no decai, dont turn this into another rust/scum/dayZ whatever! is that so hard to get it!
Zentz Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:12am 
A good start. The type of raiding the server has NEEDS to be an option in the server browser so server owners don't have to put it in the name.

Also, look into an option where only crates can be looted but the base not just stolen maybe?

Server owner should also have options as far as decaying goes.
Loaf Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:16am 
Originally posted by KIRIN STRONG:
How about you leave it the way it is?

The old raid token system had some fundamental flaws which allowed for exploits, and other unfair tactics. For example, if your base became raidable, its super easy to quickly respawn at your base to move all of your best gear over to your friends base, keeping it all safe. Of course there is also the alt account problem, which is even more difficult to fix. So keeping the old token system doesn't really make sense from the perspective of a developer

I had a lot of fun with the old token system personally, so I get that its sad to see it go. But after raiding enough times, and seeing suspiciously empty crates at a lot of raids, the problems become more obvious
-DeadShoT- Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:20am 
How bout you give us something to do ingame ... I can tell 90% of active players went to play other games while your servers r 90% empty.... I love this game and ill play it ofc in future but come on... Add some small updates give us something.... not jst WIP 1month apart....
I honestly can't understand this mania you have for making things worse. You asked for suggestions and they were given, so you come up with the possibility of choosing three types of servers? That won't get us anywhere. There will continue to be those who are against raids and those who are in favor. This suggestion of three types of servers will only further fill the server's performance capacity. What needs to happen is a PVP server that is raidable and that also has a base protection system when the player is offline. Now you come up with three types of server models, in other words, it will continue to be the same and we won't move forward with the decision. I just want to see if in the end you will have a bunch of servers with little popularity because the crowd will be even more divided. Honestly, our feedback was of no use, because if you had really read it, you would have put only one server model with firearms to be activated by base owners when they are offline. If the guy doesn't want to be raided, then he should go play PVE. You have completely lost focus. I will no longer give my opinion because I have seen that the players' opinions and feedback are useless to you. You can do whatever you want and you throw our opinions in the trash. Regrettable.
Originally posted by SIGARETPEEK KASU:
I read something about turrets, where's that idea?
I agree with you:
Well, I also gave this idea of ​​protection towers with ammunition that the base owner could activate when offline, but the developers of this game don't listen to us and do what they think should be done. In my opinion, they are giving opinions to those who don't want to listen, wasting our time so they can come up with this suggestion of 3 servers! In my opinion, this is a wrong decision. This is not what the community asked for. What the community asked for was a protection system to embrace players who were offline. They gave the idea of ​​DEFENSE TOWERS, they gave the idea of ​​TIME CLOCK (WHERE THE PLAYER CHOOSES A 3-HOUR WINDOW OF VUNERABILITY WITHIN THE 24 HOURS OF THE REAL DAY), and what do they publish? 3 servers as an option. Honestly, this is a waste of time. I will no longer waste my time giving my opinion to those who don't want to listen.
Last edited by BRZ-LOG I SCOBRA-BR | 039; Aug 23, 2024 @ 11:34am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 111 comments
Per page: 1530 50