Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
But honestly, what is this about? Are you running out of wood? I'm building giant bases and still have forests next to my base.
That's not the problem, it's just frustrating and unnatural.
Everthing else spawns back but not trees. I don't say they should fully grow overnight but still, a natural cycle would be expected.
LOTRO.
Eco....
Now I don't play many games like this kind of survival but I doubt they would leave trees to this state.
Moreover, when you make a game that puts such emphasis on realism, it's very strange.
Why make trunks and branches respawn around in the forests if the trees don't actually have a life cycle ?
Also Ark Survival Evolved, Ark Ascended, and Palworld can be added to that list.
Decorating your base may include leaving small beach saplings in gardens and such. I't not very inconvenient to plant trees once you get to the bronze age. Then, you can actually plant your trees exactly where you want them.
I do like the mod that will grow the tree back after removing the stump, but it is hard to build a base where trees repopulate where you want a large flat, open area.
I think it would be better it the mod re-grew the tree only if you left the stump in place.
Took the liberty of clipping out most of the whining to get to the base of the question:
What is the point the little trees if they don't mature?
It's so you don't need an axe to get your wood to make your first axe.
You can punch the baby trees into wood, you can't punch a matured tree into wood.
Since the baby trees don't mature, we can infer that they're exempt from the code that handles growth of cultivated stuff.
Sure there are always fallen branches and bushes you can punch for wood that prevents a hard lock, but most wouldn't find it enjoyable to be out without your axe and have a need for wood quickly since in less than 3 in game days trees mature.
Keeping the immature trees static in their "growth" cycle ensures that you will "always*" have the option to collect wood at more than a single piece at a time from fallen branches. Plant growth in Valheim isn't based on proximity like other elements are.
* Sure you could also deforest the entire game, but under normal circumstances you'll never run into the problem of being unable to make a stone axe quickly.
If Valheim were to make it so trees grow they would have to add extra code to make them proximity because you'd run into the issue of every single tree being mature and requiring an axe to harvest after a handful of days running around getting started.
Trees drop "seeds," on average, more than 50% of the time when you chop a tree down, also chance to drop more than 1 seed. So on average most players will balance out with a net positive of basic tree seeds to replant if they want. Because of that there is an unlikely scenario of having a wood shortage.
So my question is, Why do you want the static trees to automatically grow without any player input? What purpose do you think that would change?
And if you don't want trees to grow back, take the sprout out of your building area.
The sprouts should start growing by themselves immediatly, for a part of them, where the branches fell.
Like in real life.
From what I understand, they don't grow back inside your base circle. The devs said on the forums that everything coming back, with the player having no impact on the world, is due to limitations, not because they have a natural tree growth life cycle. It was something about saves being massive and taking forever, and that they'd possibly add an option where everything doesn't come back in the future. The entire world outside of your base is just being reset constantly. It isn't natural tree growth.
Edit: Not that I'm against the idea of them slowly growing back, but I actually like that you can see your impact on the world here.
And that's the same with LOTRO. They aren't growing back unless there was some massive update in recent years. Everything is just resetting to how it was constantly. YOu have no impact on the world. If you can damage a rock, it grows back too in these games...