Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I find it very archaic to be honest.
That being said, I have heard that DEV is being active navy personnel.
AFAIK the modern US navy doesn't actually use the CA classification since shortly after WWII.
But there's not much reason that the Nebulous space navies should be focused on first-half-of-the-20th-century naval classifications.
So a BB is a Battleship Battleship?
They changed it to "BB" for reasons I haven't been able to find much on.
Note that destroyers are similarly DD despite it being very hard to spell destroyer with two 'D's.
Nope.
+1 for for CA.
DD = Destroyer
DE = Destroyer Escort (i.e. a frigate FF)
DDE = Escort Destroyer (i.e. destroy designed for convoy escort and ASW)
DDK = ASW Destroyer
DDG = Missile Destroyer
DEG = Missile Destroyer Escort, which was also FFG)
There are historic reasons for all of these, and none of it is consistent! Although I don't believe the US navy ever used DE and FF at the same time