Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No, that was her mother's married name. sm
Daughter to Booker Dewitt & Annabelle DeWitt (Deceased)
"The populace of the city was told that Anna, renamed Elizabeth, was a miracle child who grew in Lady Comstock's womb for only seven days before her birth. Elizabeth was to be upheld as the heir to Comstock's throne who would one day "cleanse the world of the Sodom below." However, Lady Comstock believed that Elizabeth was the "bastard child" of Rosalind Lutece and Comstock, and demanded that the child be removed from her home."
Source: bioshock.fandom.com/wiki/Elizabeth
When I first saw the similarities in their names and style of dress I had thought that the devs were intending to create a COMPLETE time paradox using Anna's relationship to Booker.
Even though it was gross, I thought it would have been interesting if Elizabeth/Anna had grown up to BECOME her own mother, kind of like how booker became comstock and went back in time to steal his own daughter.
Again, quite disgusting, but makes for crazy timey-wimey stuff. Probably for the best it wasn't canon.
What are you talking about? Comstock is an alternate version of Booker who accepted the baptism while Booker rejected it. Comstock is prematurely aged, he is not a future version of Booker. sm