Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And Elizabeth didn't have any real happiness. She had no friends, no family, no home. And most importantly *no Booker*. (A theme of BSI is that Booker and Elizabeth/Anna don't have good lives without each other. Remeber the Barbershop quartet near the start of the game singing "What would I de without you? Well we know.) Paris was a fantasy that she created to try and hide from what she had done. And even she states she wasn't really happy there. She was trying to fool herself into thinking she was happy. Elizabeth was a damaged person who eally didn't have anything to live for. But she found something worth dying for.
Also I don't think that the dev's were trying to show things are predestined at all. Elizabeth DID have a choice and she chose to do the right thing, pay her debt rather than turn and run away from what she had done. In a very real way Elizabeth took the path Booker did. She did something she considered horribly wrong and either could accept responsibility for it as Booker did or run away from it as Comtock did. This is also a big hint that after what happened in Raptue that Elizabeth goes back to being Anna in 1893 just as Booker went back to 1893 in the after credits scene in the main game. So Elizabeth may (should) not be really dead. sm
Btw
Would you kindly to explain, how did last Comstock survive after killing Booker(exactly person on whom we play) until choosing (You know, there is 2 ways starts but if Booker didn't chose and live in 1893 he didn't start Comstock line and "Bad Booker's life")?
I think you are asking why Comstock wasn't wiped from existence by Booker being killed in the Last Baptism. The reason is that when you travel to a new reality you become part of that new reality. Even if your old reality is wiped out or changed, you are not affected by it. It's like moving into a new house. If your old house burns down, all the stuff you moved does not get burned does it? Nope. Same thing with hoping realities in BSI. sm
at the same time dead and alive. there's no reason: lived, live, will live .
That meant Lutece omg, I think I finally understand.
Thank you for reply.
And when Liz' could see all of the doors, she could see that Sally and the Little Sisters would escape from Rapture.
Bioshock Infinite is also set in an Infinite Multiverse where every possibility is played out, there is a repeating cycle in that multiverse, which is represented by the Bioshock games.
And Bioshock Infinite was riffing on everything 'Shock that has gone before. Check out the earlier System Shock and Bioshock games.
I have only cried twice in my life when I was 9 I got hit by a bus and when I finished that game.
just like our Eliz. variables and constants. Such dramatic and at the same time happy ending. btw I cried a lot too. ♥♥♥♥ this unfair world
At the risk or repeating myself, there is something else to help soften the blow. What happened to Booker should also happen to Elizabeth. She would wake up in 1893 just as Bookier, did but as Anna. And isn't that they both wanted? sm
Those are some pretty sh*tty priorities.
They are supposed to be that way. It's a way to show how badly Elizabeth was damaged by what she went through. And that despite that damage (or because of it) she went and did what she could to undo what she had done and break the cycle of abuse in Rapture. sm