Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
First, no. Just no.
Second, how does what you say make ANY sense? You're saying PSVR is "rigged" to let you WIN FREE chips as an incentive to BUY chips? That's the OPPOSITE of what would make someone want to buy chips.
5 days in a row constant losing.
If I have a straight, someone else has a flush, I have a flush, someone else always has a full house, I a full house, .... you got it, someone else 4 of a kind.
Plus: if I get suited card, 9 out of 10 times the flop will NOT have that kind. COMPLETE RIGGED GAME. YOU DON'T PAY, YOU DON'T WIN.
This is the worst kind of comment on these free money video poker games. This is not like real poker.
First my anecdote, I have gotten more bad beats on big pots than I have won big pots.
I have won more money pressing "All-in" every single hand than I have won playing correctly.
This game rewards bad play; on top of that, people are more likely to just play anything because it's "not real money".
So while, statistically, you will see more wins on the river than in real poker, this game seems rigged because of how often certain players win for no reason other than just playing every single hand. I don't mean just winning more hands, because of playing more hands = winning more hands. I mean, they win every hand they play. Not even playing "statistically" good cards or sets. Just "seemingly" randomly playing hands and winning with Full House, Flush, Straight, Four of a Kind... over and over, back to back.
I played probably 50 hands yesterday and won 1 of them. Not because I was playing poorly, I wasn't, I just never got cards to play on. I played what I could and took reasonable bets, just never hit. Everyone else was just throwing "all-in to the wind" pre-flop and winning with big hands. Actually, the only reason I won is because I felt like it was my turn to win so I called an all in with a Q/9 off-suit pre-flop and hit a full house.
Most of the people I see who play this are below the age of 25. They aren't particularly poker experts either. They, also, often have the Meta Quest series headset and a ton of props. I assume they are, also, members (colored names) and or spend real money on the game.
I've heard of so many people who say they only play Texas Hold'em to get money to play Roulette. They join a table, go all-in over and over, win every hand, and leave.
I don't know how anyone could honestly say, "That's poker."
You can view the certificate here:
https://itechlabs.com/certificates/luckyvr/RNG_Certificate_UK_LuckyVRInc_10Dec19.pdf
Seen dealer hit a 2 card 20 7+ times in a row on more than 1 occasion (odds are like 1/1,400,000 or something like that).
If you up your bet size on craps it will always crap within 3 rolls, point established, 1 number hits (or crap out), then 7 100% of the time. I teste this a bunch. I would play normally at a 100k buy in. lose eventually, go up to 250, tried that 14 times in a row and could not get past 4 rolls. The game is 100% rigged to make you lose and seeing as they never pay out regardless the incentive is 100% there. Even if you could prove it was rigged they would legally be able to skirt this by saying "we aren't a casino and we don't pay out". They would lose players but not their money.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3422112553&fileuploadsuccess=1
The chances of a dealer getting 20 or 21 on 7 consecutive hands in blackjack are extremely low, considered statistically improbable; the exact probability depends on the number of decks used, but it would be significantly less than 1% and likely fall in the realm of 0.001% or even lower.