Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Lul when i played these kinds of game, I generally avoid trying to make sense of these illogical moments. Like when i climbing up the ladder in the library with Mr.X right behind.
He would wait for me to climb up there first then proceeded to climb the ladder himself
Well, there was never any doubt about this. The thing was if a flame round is sufficient. It isn't.
In your experience it isn't, but to some other players it is. Or at least it is against some of the Lickers, because as Xengre pointed out the common situation would be just killing the few most annoying Lickers, then simply ignoring the rest so it's not something most people would try everytime. Then again, we aren't precisely talking about the game with the most solid and consistent damage mechanics.
Can't you just admit that "one flame round is enough" is BS, for christ's sake? We have also a much better video than mine in which, in sequence, a guy kills one with a flame round and then fails to kill the next one with a flame round. But no, no way you can simply say "I was wrong".
My first answer was "Stun him with an acid round and then finish him off with whatever best weapon you have", then you came along "duh a Flame round is enough".
I then went to verify this, I spent time and effort to see if maybe I was wrong, came out with proof, other people added more proof, and still you are unable to admit that is was BS.
For Chris' sake.
I agree with your method and won't rely on the grenade launcher alone, I was asking for Claires most reliable way, not the most efficient.
I'm happy to lose out on some small efficiency by "wasting" a few gun shots after a grenade, or in the case of 2 lickers at once, Silence SMG.
My question was answered, no need to get so personally invested in people claiming you are doing something wrong, it's the internet, everyone else has the best ideas no matter what reality dictates.
A licker eats two flame rounds, a couple of handgun bullets (to finish him off) and is still kicking. How frickin' reliable! But I guess it was "some gamer's experience".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p46lqcbnl9E#action=share
Sorry, I'm on the edge because I'm quarantined (the real darn virus), and because I spent some time making sure I wasn't BSing.
Second licker in that video you're talking about is shot while it's hanging in the wall, and therefore falls and doesn't take the AoE burning damage. The first one does, because it's on the floor when it gets hit, and dies in one shot.
I don't have to admit anything, you're the one getting overly dramatic and claiming what I've said is BS, plus I never said you were wrong, just that I and others had a different experience. You're the one acting as if anyone who doesn't agree with your statement is wrong. In my first post I said one flame round kills them, but if it somehow doesn't (because I allways acknowledged that it may fail), you can take their remaining health with a couple of extra handgun bullets.
It's like if someone says "one point blank shotgun range decapitates a zombie" and you say "No, that's BS because I saw zombies surviving that". Depending on the circumstances and whatever variables it will work as expected or not, but it definitely does happen.