Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
you are simply unbelievable with the intellectual dishonesty and mental gymnastics you go through to defend your position. but i knew you would reply back.
i already check mated you dude. you are a living example of the dunning kreuger effect.
It's precisely because he tries to show evidence that I can easily debunk them, something you know all too well.
That's not strawman, learn what strawman argument means.
I did not make up your claim about "realism" or "x-men" - I simply commented on the irony that you would combine the two.
That is *not* how kinetic energy works; that's why I told you it's irrelevant and you need to learn what kinetic energy actually means.
I'm not even going to wait for you to realize your mistake - kinetic energy is the energy *in motion*, your little fictional power-charge object flying toward target only has the kinetic energy of an object in motion, not of that "explosion" that happens on impact, that's potential energy.
None of that is relevant because gambit's power is, obviously, fictional; the usage of kinetic energy is just a shoddy way to explain the power for it to make sense to children like you.
Finally, I gave you the hints, and a chance to fix your own mistake:
But you *still* refused to learn.
So here we go:
7.62x39 has generally poorer ballistic coefficient and thus it loses a lot more energy past 300m.
Helmet is possibly worn and stopped most of the round.
Distance is how it loses a lot of energy, as mentioned above, partly due to ballistic coefficient.
There seems to be no penetration of skull, nor significant energy imparted onto his head, so your typical factors in terminal ballistics for measuring flesh wound(temporary and permanent cavity + fragmentations) basically doesn't exist.
All of the above factors made it possible for human to survive a shot to head. Not your logic-free "hard head."
Finally, this is what a 7.62x39 bullet looks like:
https://media.mwstatic.com/product-images/src/Primary/260/260827.jpg?imwidth=2200
See any difference?
Yes...that's right, the base of the "bullet" in video was shiny, suggesting fragmentation. (hence, that's not the whole bullet, if it is even a bullet)
You don't even know if it came from "AK 47" since it could be any other variant of AK, or even 5.45.
In conclusion, you never had any credibility and your attempt at providing sources only proved you wrong instead. Hence you took the L by default.
nice try
Projection, intellectual(oxymoronic when used with you, I know) dishonesty and mental gymnastics were all on you. As I proved your mental gymnastics(seeing as you refused to acknowledge any fact/logic I posted and instead went ahead and claimed I'm "100% wrong") earlier, you tried to use it against me thinking that could even the odds.
Unfortunately, for you, using big words you don't understand only embarrass yourself when you don't know what it means.
It's Dunning Kruger and you're imagining it. Plus you don't even know what it means(as usual, since you didn't know what kinetic energy means either)
I don't think *everyone else* is wrong; I just *know* you're dumb.
you sir are an idiot and its damn near impossible to win an argument with an idiot.
Once again that's not what dunning kruger means.
My "speculations" - as you like to call it, are backed up by facts and logic.
Your own speculation is simply devoid of fact and logic; your mental gymnastics prevented you from recognizing that fact ... the fact that your speculation is based on your feelings alone, not knowledge of how a bullet actually works.
I even provided a picture for you to compare with the object in video.
Once again you have conceded on all points you failed to address.
Your life must not have been very long for you to not have met someone more knowledgeable in a subject than you.
What you're describing is your own mental gymnastics - you've simply refused to recognize that you've lost through ignoring everything that countered your ideas perfectly. Your coping mechanism is basically telling yourself, publicly, that none of what I posted makes sense, when in fact they make lots of sense to people who are still using their brain.
Dunning Kruger is when *you* think you're not terrible at this and instead thinks I'm the idiot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
Imagine caring about arbitrary internet points.
Let's bring this to reddit and see if you get downvoted to oblivion, shall we?
"you sir are an idiot and its damn near impossible to win an argument with an idiot. " - says you, you can't win because you *are* the idiot.
I already won against an idiot like you; you just couldn't see it, as usual.
even though i disagreed with that other person before i need to take my leave as this is going no where as you think you are right and you are anything but,
they had the right idea when they left and i think im going to join them. you are clearly a narcisist.
your just like pigeon that poops all over the chess board and thinks it has won.