ROMANCE OF THE THREE KINGDOMS XIV

ROMANCE OF THE THREE KINGDOMS XIV

View Stats:
Lord gameplay only?
https://www.pcgamer.com/romance-of-the-three-kingdoms-14-announced-due-early-2020/

"Koei said Romance of the Three Kingdoms 14 will help return "classic gameplay" to the series by using the ruler-based systems from the 9th and 11th entries, which means all actions take place on a single, hex-based map. The aim is to gather and manage land during the fall of the Han Dynasty in ancient China, using diplomacy or force as needed."

Seriously Koei? :/ Half the fun of this series is being able to pick between being a Lord or working your way up as an Officer/Free Agent. I know you're scared since Total War jumped in to take your pie, but this caused any initial interest to curdle away. Being reductive with your gameplay mechanics on top of how you butchered RoTK 13 /and/ still refuse to release English translations for the old games - most of which have official English translations out there on console, does not endear any confidence in your capabilities.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
BloodyPork Sep 13, 2019 @ 5:23am 
The "Lord" only RTK games tend to be better, IX and XI are probably the 2 best RTK.

X and XIII are garbage. Although VII and VIII are pretty good, still Koei havent made a good officer play game in a long time.

Same thing with Nobunaga really, the one where you can play as officers, Ascension is the worst one.
Last edited by BloodyPork; Sep 13, 2019 @ 5:24am
Xav Sep 14, 2019 @ 11:20pm 
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
The "Lord" only RTK games tend to be better, IX and XI are probably the 2 best RTK.

X and XIII are garbage. Although VII and VIII are pretty good, still Koei havent made a good officer play game in a long time.

Same thing with Nobunaga really, the one where you can play as officers, Ascension is the worst one.

Yeah that's highly subjective. X is widely considered by many to be the greatest of all time. Everyone has their favorites but X is is favored quite a bit (coming for someone who think's it's only decent). My personal favorite was VIII which had, in my opinion, the perfect mix of rpg and strategy components. These quirky RPG components of the series is the main draw vs Total War and the ability to manage relationships/rank fleshes that out (duels, debates, tournaments,coupe, etc)t. Without it, there are better strategy games out there.

Random ranking list easily found with X at the top: https://www.ranker.com/list/romance-of-the-three-kingdoms-games/video-game-info

Every list is subjective but X had some pretty unique draws in it's RPG-ness that usually make it into people's top 3

Last edited by Xav; Sep 14, 2019 @ 11:28pm
BloodyPork Sep 15, 2019 @ 12:08am 
Originally posted by Xav:
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
The "Lord" only RTK games tend to be better, IX and XI are probably the 2 best RTK.

X and XIII are garbage. Although VII and VIII are pretty good, still Koei havent made a good officer play game in a long time.

Same thing with Nobunaga really, the one where you can play as officers, Ascension is the worst one.

Yeah that's highly subjective. X is widely considered by many to be the greatest of all time. Everyone has their favorites but X is is favored quite a bit (coming for someone who think's it's only decent). My personal favorite was VIII which had, in my opinion, the perfect mix of rpg and strategy components. These quirky RPG components of the series is the main draw vs Total War and the ability to manage relationships/rank fleshes that out (duels, debates, tournaments,coupe, etc)t. Without it, there are better strategy games out there.

Random ranking list easily found with X at the top: https://www.ranker.com/list/romance-of-the-three-kingdoms-games/video-game-info

Every list is subjective but X had some pretty unique draws in it's RPG-ness that usually make it into people's top 3
It's more casual. It's the easiest ROTK game due to certain mechanics that are easy to abuse. It is also the easiest entry point for ROTK game and look the best at first glance, basically the one RTK that would shine the most to the average "reviewers" and "critics."

The role playing system is one of the most fun but there are some very poor mechanics and balance, which includes some of very critical flaws compared to other games. Like how AI autoresolve combat in cities considering city defense values for example, even your city have tons of troops you will still lose in autoresolve if city defense goes to 0 in auto resolve. Or how broken ranged piercing units are/tower and the "direct" command. RTK IX for example has one of the weakest presentation and least role playing, however it has much less balance problem, and more robust AI along with game mechanics that are designed with the AI capabilities in mind. Another good example is how RTK XIII puk makes the game worse and less balanced than vanilla because they added mechanics that the AI couldn't use properly and makes it very easy for the players to exploit them and gain massive advantage over the ai and thus trivialize the game, like traps or relationship buffs.

There's different types of players who play ROTK, if you look at it from strategy games standpoint X is indeed the weakest in the entry. Great for casual roleplaying though. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of things that are fun in X, even the debate system is the most fun. It's very strong in the role playing department and there's a lot of fun things you can do, but at the same time it has the most critical flaws which can't be overlooked when you are trying to compare it with other titles in the series.

The only way to rank RTK games fairly is to spend at least 30 hours on each of them (at least the modern ones after the playstation era). Most people who like X the most only play X and two or three other titles at most, and not liking the "ruler" only conquest based ones such as 9 and 11.
Last edited by BloodyPork; Sep 15, 2019 @ 12:10am
pylory Sep 15, 2019 @ 10:28am 
Originally posted by Xav:
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
The "Lord" only RTK games tend to be better, IX and XI are probably the 2 best RTK.

X and XIII are garbage. Although VII and VIII are pretty good, still Koei havent made a good officer play game in a long time.

Same thing with Nobunaga really, the one where you can play as officers, Ascension is the worst one.

Yeah that's highly subjective. X is widely considered by many to be the greatest of all time. Everyone has their favorites but X is is favored quite a bit (coming for someone who think's it's only decent). My personal favorite was VIII which had, in my opinion, the perfect mix of rpg and strategy components. These quirky RPG components of the series is the main draw vs Total War and the ability to manage relationships/rank fleshes that out (duels, debates, tournaments,coupe, etc)t. Without it, there are better strategy games out there.

Random ranking list easily found with X at the top: https://www.ranker.com/list/romance-of-the-three-kingdoms-games/video-game-info

Every list is subjective but X had some pretty unique draws in it's RPG-ness that usually make it into people's top 3

Different regions have different "popular opinion" on top 3 of ROTK.
In China it is 9 and 11.

In Japan,
https://w.atwiki.jp/gcmatome/pages/1471.html
This could be a good reference.
(9 is still regarded highly)

I don't know what is the general opinion from the west.

But I will say popular opinion itself is not really meaningful when you are very into gaming
which means you spent more time than average player in gaming.


When you played more games, you have broader taste and experience to compare.
Something that is good might looks meh to you once you play too many games,
Something that is meh might looks good to you once you play too many games.

The audience/underlying population of the poll is more important .
Their nationality, their gaming experience, Their preference, their age , their gender, their job. Otherwise if you simply ask the whole world what is the best PC/console game now.
COD and fortnite will surely on that list...
Last edited by pylory; Sep 15, 2019 @ 10:39am
BloodyPork Sep 16, 2019 @ 5:27am 
Originally posted by pylory:
[
When you played more games, you have broader taste and experience to compare.
Something that is good might looks meh to you once you play too many games,
Something that is meh might looks good to you once you play too many games.

Well said. This is why many mainstream "game journalist" opinion is rubbish if he/she doesnt even play that much games.

This is why games that are easy to get into (eg. fortnite) are always the most popular. But is it the best game for you? Maybe not.

That's why I've said the only way someone can properly rank rtk games is if they have played most of Koei's historical sim and also other conquest slgs.

lebeststratege Sep 22, 2019 @ 12:39pm 
my favorite RoTK is the 11 for a long gameplay standpoint, and I like the 13 for the officer one... but it tend to get boring way faster to me
GUST Sep 24, 2019 @ 4:38pm 
Well they tried new things and the consumers didn't like it so its wise to go back to ''Ruler" and a single map system like 11 which I really like.
BloodyPork Sep 25, 2019 @ 4:25am 
Originally posted by GUST777:
Well they tried new things and the consumers didn't like it so its wise to go back to ''Ruler" and a single map system like 11 which I really like.
13 isn't bad outside of the terrible unbalanced combat and weak combat ai.
robomagon Oct 3, 2019 @ 5:51am 
Man. That just about killed any interest I had in this. :(
And hope that officer play could be added in a PUK?
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
X and XIII are garbage.

Literally nobody ever called X trash... X in fact, has so many more refined and finetuned systems than VIII and IX its not funny anymore(loyalty for example.) Just because its not your personal favorite you don't need to try so hard to discredit it. Its certainly a fan favorite on many RTK forums, including the scholars and kongming.

Whatever your personal opinion on the old games might be is irrelevant. VIII & X are often called favorites. IX is pretty much forgotten because XI overshadows it. Whether its your favorite or not, doesn't matter.

Originally posted by BloodyPork:
13 isn't bad outside of the terrible unbalanced combat and weak combat ai.

lol
Last edited by Archbishop Desmond Calorie; Oct 3, 2019 @ 2:17pm
BloodyPork Oct 4, 2019 @ 4:48am 
Originally posted by Galaxy Mate:
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
X and XIII are garbage.

Literally nobody ever called X trash... X in fact, has so many more refined and finetuned systems than VIII and IX its not funny anymore(loyalty for example.) Just because its not your personal favorite you don't need to try so hard to discredit it. Its certainly a fan favorite on many RTK forums, including the scholars and kongming.

Whatever your personal opinion on the old games might be is irrelevant. VIII & X are often called favorites. IX is pretty much forgotten because XI overshadows it. Whether its your favorite or not, doesn't matter.

Originally posted by BloodyPork:
13 isn't bad outside of the terrible unbalanced combat and weak combat ai.

lol
Obviously you only know english speaking forums. Go read up a little bit more on top on links about views from chinese/japanese players.

Honestly I can't be bothered to even argue about this because it's common knowledge among ch/jp players that X is nowhere close to the top of the contest.
robomagon Oct 4, 2019 @ 7:25am 
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
Originally posted by Galaxy Mate:

Literally nobody ever called X trash... X in fact, has so many more refined and finetuned systems than VIII and IX its not funny anymore(loyalty for example.) Just because its not your personal favorite you don't need to try so hard to discredit it. Its certainly a fan favorite on many RTK forums, including the scholars and kongming.

Whatever your personal opinion on the old games might be is irrelevant. VIII & X are often called favorites. IX is pretty much forgotten because XI overshadows it. Whether its your favorite or not, doesn't matter.



lol
Obviously you only know english speaking forums. Go read up a little bit more on top on links about views from chinese/japanese players.

Honestly I can't be bothered to even argue about this because it's common knowledge among ch/jp players that X is nowhere close to the top of the contest.
Really? A pooh-pooh fallacy is your response?
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
Obviously you only know english speaking forums. Go read up a little bit more on top on links about views from chinese/japanese players.

Honestly I can't be bothered to even argue about this because it's common knowledge among ch/jp players that X is nowhere close to the top of the contest.

English isn't even my first or SECOND language so your first argument is already out of the window...


Originally posted by robomagon:
Really? A pooh-pooh fallacy is your response?

Yep, his first part is also using a fallacy. Hell, the whole post is a "no true scotsman" fallacy, by implying that the REAL fans wouldn't rank X that high. Its funny and sad at the same time when someone is so out of their depth...

Its always a sure sign that someone's arguments are not true when they talk in fallacies. But hey, let him toot his horn if it makes him feel better about himself. Its not like he's changing anything at this point.
Last edited by Archbishop Desmond Calorie; Oct 4, 2019 @ 10:50am
BloodyPork Oct 5, 2019 @ 1:29am 
Originally posted by Galaxy Mate:
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
Obviously you only know english speaking forums. Go read up a little bit more on top on links about views from chinese/japanese players.

Honestly I can't be bothered to even argue about this because it's common knowledge among ch/jp players that X is nowhere close to the top of the contest.

English isn't even my first or SECOND language so your first argument is already out of the window...


Originally posted by robomagon:
Really? A pooh-pooh fallacy is your response?

Yep, his first part is also using a fallacy. Hell, the whole post is a "no true scotsman" fallacy, by implying that the REAL fans wouldn't rank X that high. Its funny and sad at the same time when someone is so out of their depth...

Its always a sure sign that someone's arguments are not true when they talk in fallacies. But hey, let him toot his horn if it makes him feel better about himself. Its not like he's changing anything at this point.
You sound stupid. There's no point to even argue with your kind.
Last edited by BloodyPork; Oct 5, 2019 @ 1:38am
robomagon Oct 5, 2019 @ 2:04am 
Originally posted by BloodyPork:
Originally posted by Galaxy Mate:

English isn't even my first or SECOND language so your first argument is already out of the window...




Yep, his first part is also using a fallacy. Hell, the whole post is a "no true scotsman" fallacy, by implying that the REAL fans wouldn't rank X that high. Its funny and sad at the same time when someone is so out of their depth...

Its always a sure sign that someone's arguments are not true when they talk in fallacies. But hey, let him toot his horn if it makes him feel better about himself. Its not like he's changing anything at this point.
You sound stupid. There's no point to even argue with your kind.
Yeah, trying to form a coherent argument would require some brainpower.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 10, 2019 @ 11:26pm
Posts: 18