Ultimate Custom Night

Ultimate Custom Night

My Observation In UCN and Michael a.k.a. Cassidy With the rest of the FNAF Series.(Used Dawko's Ideas to stitch this Theory Together)
It's too obvious that William killed Cassidy and not "Michael", and I don't think Cassidy's older brother is "Michael". If you remember, Fredbear said that he will put back together, when it's really William who is going to put Cassidy back together(since it's just a Fredbear Plush with a Walkie Talkie and was talking to Michael all along), and whenever he was put back, William changed his name from Cassidy to Michael to ensure that he won't remember anything, just like a lobomoty. After you beat 10/20 in SLCN, Michael said in FNAF:SL he should be dead, but he's not, making him live in shadows. And also, certain characters say similar lines,"-the one you shouldn't have killed". And once you get closer and closer to 50/20 mode, you have a greater chance to see a face everytime you pull down your monitor, take off your mask, close any door or vent, or even dying will make it appear, and we have a confirmation that he is indeed Golden Freddy because of Old Man Consequences. This is all because of this one move William did in order to get his son back is to unplug the Ivy and take him home. I found this because of if you listen very closely, you'll hear a very fainted sound that is like a plug pulled out of the outlet and a flatline in the end(might be something else, but it is true either way). He tried to fix Cassidy, and discovered remnant, and used it to bring Cassidy back to life, but in a different way and with a different name. It can't be false because otherwise Michael wouldn't survive in the Scupper, having Ennard inside of him, and later on throwing him out into the sewer, while Elisabeth says to Michael "You Won't Die." What do you guys think? (And please don't be negative about this, this made me do soul searching.)@Michael isn't the Older Brother, Michael is Cassidy. If you don't believe me, look at the Survival LogBook.
< >
Visualizzazione di 136-144 commenti su 144
Messaggio originale di The True Old Sport:
Messaggio originale di Mr. Enzadavinci:
Trying to make several connections, such as Mike's book, a.k.a. Michael Afton, who is trying (facepalm*) to get Golden Freddy's name. But, the thing is, is that Cassidy can't be killed in FNAF4 by Michael because in UCN, several characters say this at the end of their lines,"-the one you shouldn't have killed". I was thinking it was William who killed his son, Cassidy, because Michael saw it all since (I or we still don't know if he's the older brother or Cassidy, too controversal), well, Cassidy's head is nothing but a smashed tin can, but he is alive, but in a coma, like a "lobotomy". It can't be Michael because otherwise he would be dead, and we won't hear the flatline at the end of 20/20/20/20 mode in FNAF4. It's way, way too damn obvious, right?
1. Cassidy. Isn't. William's. Son.
2. Cassidy isn't CC.
3. Cassy is a girl.
4. She's the fifth missing child that becomes GF. How hard is that to get?
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
Ultima modifica da Ender; 16 lug 2018, ore 12:06
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Messaggio originale di The True Old Sport:
1. Cassidy. Isn't. William's. Son.
2. Cassidy isn't CC.
3. Cassy is a girl.
4. She's the fifth missing child that becomes GF. How hard is that to get?
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
me?
Messaggio originale di Mr. Enzadavinci:
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
me?
No, I quoted The True Old Sport, that means I'm talking to him :/
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Messaggio originale di The True Old Sport:
1. Cassidy. Isn't. William's. Son.
2. Cassidy isn't CC.
3. Cassy is a girl.
4. She's the fifth missing child that becomes GF. How hard is that to get?
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
Yea, you don't have evidence to back your's up, such as How Cassidy cannot be William's son? How is Cassidy a girl when it shows a boy in UCN?
Messaggio originale di Mr. Enzadavinci:
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
Yea, you don't have evidence to back your's up, such as How Cassidy cannot be William's son? How is Cassidy a girl when it shows a boy in UCN?
I'm not implying that he doesn't have evidence, I'm just encouraging everybody to show it so we know why we think what we do.
And also, don't want to be offtrack here, but I suppose that the Phantoms are some representations of the original dead children, the created monstrosities William made, and the victims William lured. And I suppose that Mangle is the first one to ever be taken apart and can put himself back together, William's Creation and Not puppet's control.
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Messaggio originale di Mr. Enzadavinci:
Yea, you don't have evidence to back your's up, such as How Cassidy cannot be William's son? How is Cassidy a girl when it shows a boy in UCN?
I'm not implying that he doesn't have evidence, I'm just encouraging everybody to show it so we know why we think what we do.
Well, in his book, that's what he thinks.
Messaggio originale di Mr. Enzadavinci:
Messaggio originale di EnderGamer358:
Yes, but why?
You can't just say something with no evidence if you want to debunk a theory/create your own theory.
Yea, you don't have evidence to back your's up, such as How Cassidy cannot be William's son? How is Cassidy a girl when it shows a boy in UCN?
Cassidy is the 5th child in the books. Cassidy is the 5th child in the games. AND Cassidy is a girl, while CC is clearly a boy.
< >
Visualizzazione di 136-144 commenti su 144
Per pagina: 1530 50

Data di pubblicazione: 15 lug 2018, ore 19:12
Messaggi: 144