I think I just solved FNAF... (MUST READ [GAMES AND BOOKS SPOILER WARNING])

[SkullyBud]

Hey guys!

My name is Skully and I have something to share with you all.

After watching MattPat's theory today, it got me to do a lot of thinking about FNAF and it's confusing lore. MattPat himself has been confused and stumped about it and in this last theory he wasn't even able to give a full theory! He had a hypothesis. And just so we're clear I am not saying this to put hurt on MattPat. The dude's amazing and I dont think FNAF would be where it is without him.

After doing a lot of pondering something clicked in my head while I was in the bathroom. My heart sank as I realized that that thought connected to every major part of the FNAF lore. After repeating it several times to my friends and to myself I am almost 100% sure it is true. Today I would like to share my thoughts on this theory with all of you. Brace yourselves... because this theory unpacks a lot...

Before I do though, I would just like to ask you all to bear with me. I tend to run on sometimes and out of order, but I am going to do my best to keep this in order as much as possible. I even wrote an outline! Ok here we go.

Go to this Google Docs link to read it: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fvxLVTH_aZqbRvaJmemBWPTiPuNYT9csJqHyH4wvUnU/edit?usp=sharing

I would have done it here but the theory was 7 PAGES LONG!!! It took me hours to make this XD So go ahead and read it and let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Thanks! ~Skully

[Jesse]

My thoughts

"These kids possess the Mediocre Melodies" - I dont really think or like the idea they are possesed

"Mike is an artifical kid" - I also dislike this idea. I really dont like any theory that says Mike is a robot/artifical/kidnapped

"William killed Cassidy's dog" - No, TFC confirms it was Susies dog

"Susie. Fritz, Jeremy, and Gabriel and Mike are clones of Cassidy" - No, just why

"Mike is CC" - I can see it working, but I am mixed on the idea

"We dont play as Michael in the games and the character we do play as just thinks he is Michael" - If I understand this correctly, then this is the dumbest thing in the entire theory so far

"The Player Character eventually starts trying to remember his name and rejects the name Mike by crossing it out in the logbook" - Fazbear Entertainment/Whoever gave us the book in universe did that, see the sticky note

"The toys aren't possesed" - They are, why can toy chica take off her beak and become pupiless or how can mangle climb up walls?

"Afton killed himself on purpose" - Why?

"JRs. is where Charlie died" - No, its a bar, why would an FFP location be opened at midnight and have a bouncer?

[Jesse]

No offense, but in my opinion the theory isn't really that great. The idea that we don't play as Michael is, in all honesty, really dumb.

[SkullyBud]

@Smear We know that the Mediocre animatronics are possesed because we see their spirits at the birthday party in FNAF 3 wearing their masks. MattPat even put the pieces on that one together.

I never said Mike is a robot or anything. I'm trying to prove he and Charlie are not.

The Fourth Closet carries some thing over to the games but some of them are meant to be mere references. Nothing is for sure confirmed in the game lore, but we can use the books to help us understand the games.

I will admit that it is kind of a stretch on this one, but the evidence adds up. Maybe not in the right way, but it adds up.

That sticky note is for us. The new owner is you. That has no lore significance.

I'm not sure about the beak thing but I dont see what that has to do with her being possessed? Mangle is able to climb up walls because of his form. If they are possessed I wouldnt be against it but they would probably be the dead bodies left behind that I talked about.

It's not a bar according to what MattPat discovered in his last theories.

Also, I don't know this for sure, but it sounds like you didnt read the whole theory and just skimmed throught it? IDK but thanks for reading it anyways and thanks for giving your thoughts ;D

[Jesse]

Originally posted by SkullyBud:

@Smear We know that the Mediocre animatronics are possesed because we see their spirits at the birthday party in FNAF 3 wearing their masks. MattPat even put the pieces on that one together.

I never said Mike is a robot or anything. I'm trying to prove he and Charlie are not.

The Fourth Closet carries some thing over to the games but some of them are meant to be mere references. Nothing is for sure confirmed in the game lore, but we can use the books to help us understand the games.

I will admit that it is kind of a stretch on this one, but the evidence adds up. Maybe not in the right way, but it adds up.

That sticky note is for us. The new owner is you. That has no lore significance.

I'm not sure about the beak thing but I dont see what that has to do with her being possessed? Mangle is able to climb up walls because of his form. If they are possessed I wouldnt be against it but they would probably be the dead bodies left behind that I talked about.

It's not a bar according to what MattPat discovered in his last theories.

Also, I don't know this for sure, but it sounds like you didnt read the whole theory and just skimmed throught it? IDK but thanks for reading it anyways and thanks for giving your thoughts ;D

-What if the mediocre melodies are just references to the masks and not possesed? One of the masks doesnt even look similar to any of the MM

- You said he was a clone of Cassidy

- But why have a character whose story is the exact same as another character but has a different name in one universe?

- But it says something like "Look like someones written here, you dont mind?" Obviously from Fazbear Entertainment, not from Foxy bro who realizes Mike isnt his name

- Why would you program a robot to lose their pupils and beak, and why would you program a robot to climb up walls?

- Theres also much more evidence that it is a bar

I didnt skim through it, I read through everything and I really thought none of it made sense, but again, no offense, its just my opinion

[wheelyz]

So i dont think you mentioned how in SL, after a days work that the TV show involves Vlad and his wife, and Vlad talks about hw its not his baby which it now makes sense since william afton did clone Mike from Cassidy, which it turn doesnt make william the father

[SkullyBud]

@Smear Yeah I understand :)

I definitely don't think it's a reference. They have spirits just like the other kids that we see at peace.

Yes he's a clone, but not a robot. He's all flesh.

Have you met Scott? XD He's quite the troll. I agree thought that it is a bit absurd, but almost everything adds up. This was one of the areas I wasn't too sure about either thought, but the information I found made sense.

Yeah that's just something fun for you I'd say. Everything in the logbook links together to reveal one major part in the lore. As far as I can say, that sticky note has no lore significance and has never been proved to be.

The pupils I wouldn't argue against, but again, the beak I'm not sure why that has any significance. Mangle isn't programmed to climb up walls. Remember, Mangle was made just like the other toy animatronics and was able to put her back together the best they could. That way climbing is the way Mangle moves around.

That's a bit more debateable, but one of the major evidences that MattPat pointed out is that whoever this kid is that escape (probably Mike according to the latest theory), their footprints lead to Jr's.

[Jesse]

Originally posted by deadass timbs?:

So i dont think you mentioned how in SL, after a days work that the TV show involves Vlad and his wife, and Vlad talks about hw its not his baby which it now makes sense since william afton did clone Mike from Cassidy, which it turn doesnt make william the father

But the whole joke of TIATR is that the baby IS Vlads

[SkullyBud]

@Dead Yep. Thanks.

[wheelyz]

Originally posted by Smear:

Originally posted by deadass timbs?:

So i dont think you mentioned how in SL, after a days work that the TV show involves Vlad and his wife, and Vlad talks about hw its not his baby which it now makes sense since william afton did clone Mike from Cassidy, which it turn doesnt make william the father

But the whole joke of TIATR is that the baby IS Vlads

oof

[SkullyBud]

@Smear Yes that's the joke, but it's a reference.

[SkullyBud]

In fact, he never admits the baby is his.

[wheelyz]

Originally posted by SkullyBud:

In fact, he never admits the baby is his.

true

[Jesse]

Originally posted by SkullyBud:

@Smear Yeah I understand :)

I definitely don't think it's a reference. They have spirits just like the other kids that we see at peace.

Yes he's a clone, but not a robot. He's all flesh.

Have you met Scott? XD He's quite the troll. I agree thought that it is a bit absurd, but almost everything adds up. This was one of the areas I wasn't too sure about either thought, but the information I found made sense.

Yeah that's just something fun for you I'd say. Everything in the logbook links together to reveal one major part in the lore. As far as I can say, that sticky note has no lore significance and has never been proved to be.

The pupils I wouldn't argue against, but again, the beak I'm not sure why that has any significance. Mangle isn't programmed to climb up walls. Remember, Mangle was made just like the other toy animatronics and was able to put her back together the best they could. That way climbing is the way Mangle moves around.

That's a bit more debateable, but one of the major evidences that MattPat pointed out is that whoever this kid is that escape (probably Mike according to the latest theory), their footprints lead to Jr's.

- I still dislike the idea

- Hes still an artifical kid

- You know UCN? Well Scott is a troll so its obviously fake!

- Still it wouldnt make sense for some stuff in the logbook to be canon but other stuff not

- But still the toys behavior is odd and suggests they are possesed

- Explain to me, why would a kids resturaunt need a bouncer and be opened at midnight?

[SkullyBud]

@Smear

That's fine :)

Yeah ik, but you still said I said he was a robot. Just clarifying.

XD true but most things he is a troll about ends up being true in some part of the lore. The entire lore is a troll LOL

Everything in the logbook is cannon except for that stickynote for the enjoyment of the reader. But I do get where you are coming from.

True in a sense. If I were to say they were possessed then it would make sense that those bodies I said that were left behind would be the toy animatronics.

We are never shown that he is a bouncer. As far as we're aware it's either Henry or a cop. We also are never shown it is opened. Lights on a sign are still lit at night even when not opened. And this would make sense that it's the place of the crime scene since it's a little later that night, it's still closing down after the police report. It is an interesting building to place there, but there is no evidence showing it's a bar or at least no reason for a bar to be in the FNAF lore. It just doen't fit anywhere.

[Jesse]

Originally posted by SkullyBud:

@Smear

That's fine :)

Yeah ik, but you still said I said he was a robot. Just clarifying.

XD true but most things he is a troll about ends up being true in some part of the lore. The entire lore is a troll LOL

Everything in the logbook is cannon except for that stickynote for the enjoyment of the reader. But I do get where you are coming from.

True in a sense. If I were to say they were possessed then it would make sense that those bodies I said that were left behind would be the toy animatronics.

We are never shown that he is a bouncer. As far as we're aware it's either Henry or a cop. We also are never shown it is opened. Lights on a sign are still lit at night even when not opened. And this would make sense that it's the place of the crime scene since it's a little later that night, it's still closing down after the police report. It is an interesting building to place there, but there is no evidence showing it's a bar or at least no reason for a bar to be in the FNAF lore. It just doen't fit anywhere.

- Okay

- No, I said you said he was an artifical kid, meaning not bioligically related to anyone

- And how do you know that everything is canon besides one thing that pokes a hole in your theory?

- Fair enough but I do think they are possesed

- There are parked cars that dont look like Police Cars so it is still open