Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I know it received high critical acclaim (it really was good) but how that translated to sales I do not know.
::Edit::
Grok says it sold over 80k copies in the first week on Steam and was considered a success for the studio.
do you have any articles or statements or dev-blogs where the studio themselves made this claim? again, not trying to be a contrarian and would love to be wrong.
Because there is no real stylistic unification in the design aesthetics between the classic Shock and System Shock 2 - I think it would make sense for the remake to follow through on the ones implemented in the first remake.
That being said - I would want them to change Shock 2 a bit as well. I wouldn’t mind if the level design got some iteration to make it feel even more like a real place - but more over I would like to see the Rickenbacker, Body of the Many and ending sequence given a proper makeover to bring them in line with the game before those levels.
It would have to still include the RPG mechanics but I wouldn’t be sad if they were refined a little - but they couldn’t be gotten rid of because it is such a key part of the pacing of the game.
they never said remake of second, they said an enchanced version of second which this is which is also supposed to be the one we get for free if we pre-oredred the remaster of first game
I still can't find the news story I was referring to at the beginning of this thread, which I remember was much more specific. This news, however, is much less so, and I'm aware that they're just insinuations that may or may not have a solid foundation, but I guess it's something...
Here's the link to the news story, which, while it talks more about System Shock 3, mentions what I said. It's in Spanish, if you're interested in reading it with any translator, I'm sure you'll find it. you manage.
https://vandal.elespanol.com/noticias/pc/system-shock-3/35074#p-13
GDC = Games Developer Conference, an annual dev convention
Personally I'd love to see a SS2 remake.
Even that 12 months thing (with regards to a possible SS3-related announcement, not a SS2 remake) was like "maybe within 12 months, maybe later, it's out of our hands". (Tencent own the rights to SS3 and further SS sequels.)
Long story short, the article is just clickbait meant to get some System Shock related headlines out there to bolster hype (or at least IP awareness) around the announcement of the remaster.
VGC also ran a story about how Nightdive "remain optimistic" to get a NOLF remaster deal done even after Monolith got shut down that was just as much of a fluff piece. "It might still happen, never say never!" is true of literally anything. "Possible" is not the same thing as "likely" though, is it?
Generally speaking, you can't read these sorts of statements from a perspective of what you want them to be saying, you gotta look at what they're actually saying. In most cases, that's a whole lot less, and in this case it's basically nothing.
The most optimistic read is that it's some Inception-style 4D chess scheme to try and implant the idea of such a deal in some Tencent or WB exec's head. "Are we in talks with these people? Maybe we should be." But even that just highlights the fact that they have nothing to announce currently.
Surely if they have the rights for an SS2 Remaster they have the rights for an SS2 Remake where they could add additional story elements etc?
With regards to a remake all he said was "just because we made a remaster doesn't mean we can't make a remake in the future." - which doesn't mean a thing. All it confirms is that they CAN do it, which everyone already knows. It's non-news.