Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
hehe
Plus Eon Interstellar sounds pretty damn cool.
technological advances has nothing to do with elon, its nasa engineers that develop tech and build ships
what eliminating inefficiency? you paid from you taxes to fund elons "private" companies with goverment contracts, and after billions paid elon now will eliminate your ineficien social program
Are we talking about iterations on older, often publicly-funded tech the man is squatting on, the immature tech forced through far too early, with poor, sometimes gruesome consequences, or the lovely intersection of the two?
Again, which one? Even with McDonnell-Douglas Boeing being an eternal problem, humans would be in space, Elon or no Elon. Even if we'd have to throw more cash at ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Roscosmos to do it for a while. And speaking of!
Despite watching reasonably intently, I've yet to see any inefficiency actually eliminated. I am, however, seeing the overture to the kind of looting that made me happy to see Dmitry Rogozin losing his balls.
Oh no, a Maga didn't spend ten dollars and acts like he has some kind of leverage?
Anyway.
You're assuming they would spot the satire.
I'm very confused as to how renaming a company from "Elon" to "Eon" counts as "putting politics into a project".
Yeah, so, funny thing about that? We had all of that before Musk, we'll have all of that after Musk, and we've had plenty of it during but besides Musk, and in each instance we've had it *without* relying on a fragile little snowflake who goes crying to his mommy and his president whenever people say mean things about him, and *without* a toxic boss who pays his employees in his family's hereditary apartheid emerald mine money so that he can take the credit on all of their work.
If only we had just kept funding NASA, then we wouldn't have to be dealing with all of these fanboys gushing over a
For reference, as someone very big into technological advancement, human spaceflight, and eliminating inefficiency, I was very enamored with the guy when I was younger, when he really did seem to just be all about space exploration, renewable energy, electric cars, and all that jazz.
And then I realized how many big promises he kept making but never keeping. Where are those water filters he promised the people of Flint, Michigan all those years ago, anyways? More pertinently to what you're concerned about, when exactly was it that Musk said he'd be getting people back on the Moon and then also finally on Mars?
It's okay to admit that you fell for his grift. I know that I did. But I also admitted to myself that I had fallen for his grift, and stopped buying into the grift, and I'm much better off for it.