Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So now I have to decide to change my building shape or knock the whole thing down and start over. If we could just lay out the entire building first then it would save us this problem.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198019183905/screenshot/773974984927070437
Survival games, esp ones that cater to the singe player experience should allow you to place objects anywhere you'd like (within reason). A rock or tree clipping through a structure should not prevent the player from building where they want. Sometimes this adds to the aesthetic appeal, IE: placing a structure up against a cliff wall, incorporating a tree into the structure, or sealing off gaps in a building that's occluded by static world objects.
It seems common practice in survival games like Stranded Deep, Subnautica, or any other game that uses "snappable" structures to be placed in the world to use this mechanic. But its one that really bothers me as someone who enjoys building grand structures with high aesthetic appeal.