Triple screen possible with RX 6600?

[Rapha_JediKnight]

1080P with at least medium settings and mirror, stable 60 fps?

[goblueteam]

no idea on this one i would say probably not. i think you would probably dip below 60fps.

i have a rx6800 and on 4k single screen i get about 70-90 fps at 4k with no FSR and ultra/high settings with volumetric fog on low and bloom on medium/low sometimes. with fsr on qaulity i get around 110-140.

ACC seems to be pretty bad at running tripples so i would expect it to run worse than it would at 4k.

i would think at the very least you would want a 6700xt to have ok settings even then i do not know for sure mostly because ACC does not do well with tripple screen.

do you have a rx6600 already is it a XT version that is probably a 10-15% difference or are you looking to purchase a GPU capable of running 1080p triples in ACC

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por goblueteam:

no idea on this one i would say probably not. i think you would probably dip below 60fps.

i have a rx6800 and on 4k single screen i get about 70-90 fps at 4k with no FSR and ultra/high settings with volumetric fog on low and bloom on medium/low sometimes. with fsr on qaulity i get around 110-140.

ACC seems to be pretty bad at running tripples so i would expect it to run worse than it would at 4k.

i would think at the very least you would want a 6700xt to have ok settings even then i do not know for sure mostly because ACC does not do well with tripple screen.

do you have a rx6600 already is it a XT version that is probably a 10-15% difference or are you looking to purchase a GPU capable of running 1080p triples in ACC

I currently have a gtx 1050 2gb. But I'm upgrading my pc and building a rig. The RX 6600 is enough for iracing triples, but I'm curious about ACC. Can't pay much more though.

[goblueteam]

the 6600 is a good graphics card for the price but running triple screen in ACC is quite demanding its possible it would work with a lot of tinkering and turning settings down its just very possible it would not look very good.

ACC is also CPU demanding so if your on a old cpu it could really bottleneck you as well.

pretty much ACC is probably the hardest sim racing game to run in triple screens it sort of comes down to your expectations the 6600 is still a lower tier card so i think you could probably get it working but im just not sure that you would be blown away by the quality of graphics.

i think the rx6600 would do pretty well single screen at 1440p maybe even high refresh rate of 100-120 fps on decent settings

so its a tough one i would say regardless of the graphics card expect to spend some time getting ACC in triple screens running well I would probably try to find a XT model version if its only a little more 20-30$ but its probably not worth more than that.

also if your really set on triple screens consider a used rx6700 10gb 6700xt 12gb or 6800 16gb prices change a lot depending on your country. should be able to get a 6700 for 250ish and rx6800 for 350-375 used maybe less if you really search/get lucky.

i kind of think you would be better off just buying 1 monitor(or none if you have one already) now and putting the money for the other 2 monitors twords a better graphics card then maybe buy more monitors in 6 months or something

also ACC is notoriously bad at running VR and triple screen on low-mid range hardware while other games like iracing and AC probably would run great

anyways idk the rx6600 is a great value graphics card though i just think maybe your really asking a lot out of it though i dont think you would do any better with a 3060/3060ti although nvidia is supposed to have better software support for triple screens.

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por goblueteam:

the 6600 is a good graphics card for the price but running triple screen in ACC is quite demanding its possible it would work with a lot of tinkering and turning settings down its just very possible it would not look very good.

ACC is also CPU demanding so if your on a old cpu it could really bottleneck you as well.

pretty much ACC is probably the hardest sim racing game to run in triple screens it sort of comes down to your expectations the 6600 is still a lower tier card so i think you could probably get it working but im just not sure that you would be blown away by the quality of graphics.

i think the rx6600 would do pretty well single screen at 1440p maybe even high refresh rate of 100-120 fps on decent settings

so its a tough one i would say regardless of the graphics card expect to spend some time getting ACC in triple screens running well I would probably try to find a XT model version if its only a little more 20-30$ but its probably not worth more than that.

also if your really set on triple screens consider a used rx6700 10gb 6700xt 12gb or 6800 16gb prices change a lot depending on your country. should be able to get a 6700 for 250ish and rx6800 for 350-375 used maybe less if you really search/get lucky.

i kind of think you would be better off just buying 1 monitor(or none if you have one already) now and putting the money for the other 2 monitors twords a better graphics card then maybe buy more monitors in 6 months or something

also ACC is notoriously bad at running VR and triple screen on low-mid range hardware while other games like iracing and AC probably would run great

anyways idk the rx6600 is a great value graphics card though i just think maybe your really asking a lot out of it though i dont think you would do any better with a 3060/3060ti although nvidia is supposed to have better software support for triple screens.

I saw someone running ACC triples with a 3060 just fine in 1080p, but I can't find anyone using it with a RX 6600. I won't get triple screen anytime soon, maybe in 2 years after I get my cokpit, so maybe I will upgrade the GPU again later( used prices here are high). But I need a better graphic card now. I mostly play Iracing though, I know it will work, but I'm using ACC as a worst case scneario. There is still FSR 2 to use. The 6700 is a lot more expensive here in brazil, so is the 3060, I can get the 6600 fairly cheap, as I need money to upgrade other parts.
I'm getting a 32" curved 7h5hz1080p monitor soon, upgrading from a 27" flat 60hz1080p.
So the 6600 will be more than enough for the next 2 years. I just wanted to know if I will be able to play ACC triples later, without having to upgrade immediately.
Thanks for the answer.

[goblueteam]

just remember if you get a ultrawide monitor it is also more resolution than standard so it would use more gpu power you did not mention anything about ultra wide but that is what many people are doing these days-some people get a ultra wide instead of getting triple screens as well although it is probably not as good its probably as close as you will get on a single monitor. personally im on a 4k120hz 65inch tv it works pretty good. and my old 4k60hz 55 inch also worked well before

the rx6600 is def the best thing you can get for the money and actually competes/beats the 3060 in many games.

another thing to consider is the bigger your monitor the higher resolution you would want 32 inch at 1080p is getting to be pretty low pixel density i am not sure that is a very good upgrade path as its not much of a difference to go from a 27inch60hz 1080p and you might actually get a worse looking picture sense its stretching the pixels out farther.

the 6600 can certainly do 1080p high refresh rate for sure so i would try to get at least a 1080p 120-144hz if you can but really i think you would like the way a 1440p 27-32 inch would look much more graphically also using FSR on 1080p does not work that well it looks much worse compared to 1440p

anyways i dont think you should really spend your money unless its really an upgrade

i would get a graphics card first the 6600 is pretty much the best thing you can get for a good price and is a good choice turn off vsync and see what your fps is like uncapped at 1080p i have a feeling you will be getting a lot of FPS probably 150+ and could upgrade to 1440p monitor or 1080p high refresh rate or even 1080p ultrawide if your set on triples in the future i dont know that ultra wide would be a good option as it is more resolution than standard.

another thing is new graphics cards/tech is coming out pretty often in 2 years everything will be different again.

[goblueteam]

another great thing about the rx6600 is it uses very little power if you stayed at 1080p and limited the frame rate to 60-75 fps and undervolt the card with the built in software you can probably get it to run at like 75-100 watts and save some money on the power bill.

my rx6800 is using about 180-200 watts and is really nice for the performance @4k undervolting works great on amd cards and typically will give you better more stable performance.

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por goblueteam:

just remember if you get a ultrawide monitor it is also more resolution than standard so it would use more gpu power you did not mention anything about ultra wide but that is what many people are doing these days-some people get a ultra wide instead of getting triple screens as well although it is probably not as good its probably as close as you will get on a single monitor. personally im on a 4k120hz 65inch tv it works pretty good. and my old 4k60hz 55 inch also worked well before

the rx6600 is def the best thing you can get for the money and actually competes/beats the 3060 in many games.

another thing to consider is the bigger your monitor the higher resolution you would want 32 inch at 1080p is getting to be pretty low pixel density i am not sure that is a very good upgrade path as its not much of a difference to go from a 27inch60hz 1080p and you might actually get a worse looking picture sense its stretching the pixels out farther.

the 6600 can certainly do 1080p high refresh rate for sure so i would try to get at least a 1080p 120-144hz if you can but really i think you would like the way a 1440p 27-32 inch would look much more graphically also using FSR on 1080p does not work that well it looks much worse compared to 1440p

anyways i dont think you should really spend your money unless its really an upgrade

i would get a graphics card first the 6600 is pretty much the best thing you can get for a good price and is a good choice turn off vsync and see what your fps is like uncapped at 1080p i have a feeling you will be getting a lot of FPS probably 150+ and could upgrade to 1440p monitor or 1080p high refresh rate or even 1080p ultrawide if your set on triples in the future i dont know that ultra wide would be a good option as it is more resolution than standard.

another thing is new graphics cards/tech is coming out pretty often in 2 years everything will be different again.

My current monitor is shared with my brother (and it's starting to show defects, it's an old TV/Monitor), I'm bulding my own PC, the 32" curved monitor is really the best value I can get to get a higher FOV at the moment. Planning on using it with other 2 monitors later. I'm ready to lose Pixel density.

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Hi, I ended up getting a RTX 3060Ti. This little beast can do 100+fps at epic settings at 1080p single monitor, so, I expect it should be enough for triple screen. Loving the game now, it's gorgeous.

[76561199494761648]

I hope this helps I youtube it and here is some links.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=triple+screen+assetto+corsa+competizione

[goblueteam]

i mean i hope you got a good deal lol not that its a bad card just that its not the best value per performance and not a whole lot better than the rx6600/ xt version and gets smoked by the 6700/6700xt being closer to a 3070 with 10gb and 12gb of vram as well.

anyways its still a good card....but idk you really pay the nvidia tax and dont get more actual performance it wont be anymore capable of triple screens in my opinion

also AMD just cut prices i guess nvidia did too hopfully you bought after the price cuts it just happened like a day or 2 ago.

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por goblueteam:

i mean i hope you got a good deal lol not that its a bad card just that its not the best value per performance and not a whole lot better than the rx6600/ xt version and gets smoked by the 6700/6700xt being closer to a 3070 with 10gb and 12gb of vram as well.

anyways its still a good card....but idk you really pay the nvidia tax and dont get more actual performance it wont be anymore capable of triple screens in my opinion

also AMD just cut prices i guess nvidia did too hopfully you bought after the price cuts it just happened like a day or 2 ago.

The RX 6700 prices were actualy higher here in Brazil, or mostly the same, plus I wanted to use ray tracing in some games, it's not just a sim racing machine. I coudln't be happier, honestly. Most scenarios where the 6700/67500 is better, it's not by much anyway.

[goblueteam]

they are very similar cards and both very good cards. in the US the 6700xt can sometimes be found for less than 300 usd where the 3060ti is more like 350-375 new still.

i guess for me i am just a bit unhappy with nvidia lately not that AMD is doing a whole lot better it was smart to buy the 3060ti over the 4060ti because they are almost the same performance and to me that is just crazy for a new gen vs last gen. although the 4060ti is more power efficient.

as far as ray tracing goes im not to sure how much ray tracing either card can really handle its still a huge performance hit but for some games its not such a big deal.

the thing thats really silly is nvidia is promoting all this extra stuff like ray tracing but that uses quite a bit of vram and they are selling cards with low vram so idk its sort of strange 8gb VRAM is sort of the minimum now for new games. that is why the 10gb 6700 and 12gb 6700xt is nice in the price range gives you the ability to run higher textures/graphics settings.

either way its still a great 1080p card the 3060ti and that was a very good card from nvidia at the time of release its more so the new 40 series from nvidia that is sort of a bummer in the mid-low range so far and also many of the cards seem like they are being sold as the model above what they should be... as in the 4060 is really a 50 series and the 4070 is a 60 series or the performance we would expect anyways when comparing generations.

also i do think nvidia is a little better with setting up tripple screens for sim racing.

[rallysmo]

3060 ti for rt good luck with that

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por rallysmo:

3060 ti for rt good luck with that

I saw it running many games at max settings at 60+ fps at 1080p, not sure why I need luck with that. Bruh...

[Rapha_JediKnight]

Escrito originalmente por goblueteam:

they are very similar cards and both very good cards. in the US the 6700xt can sometimes be found for less than 300 usd where the 3060ti is more like 350-375 new still.

i guess for me i am just a bit unhappy with nvidia lately not that AMD is doing a whole lot better it was smart to buy the 3060ti over the 4060ti because they are almost the same performance and to me that is just crazy for a new gen vs last gen. although the 4060ti is more power efficient.

as far as ray tracing goes im not to sure how much ray tracing either card can really handle its still a huge performance hit but for some games its not such a big deal.

the thing thats really silly is nvidia is promoting all this extra stuff like ray tracing but that uses quite a bit of vram and they are selling cards with low vram so idk its sort of strange 8gb VRAM is sort of the minimum now for new games. that is why the 10gb 6700 and 12gb 6700xt is nice in the price range gives you the ability to run higher textures/graphics settings.

either way its still a great 1080p card the 3060ti and that was a very good card from nvidia at the time of release its more so the new 40 series from nvidia that is sort of a bummer in the mid-low range so far and also many of the cards seem like they are being sold as the model above what they should be... as in the 4060 is really a 50 series and the 4070 is a 60 series or the performance we would expect anyways when comparing generations.

also i do think nvidia is a little better with setting up tripple screens for sim racing.

Why Is Nvidia better for setting up triples? Curious.