Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm sure many will disagree with me on this but I've never heard any racing driver say x sim is close to real life. Every sim has good and bad points and at the end of the day many sim racers have never driven a race car to know what is accurate and what is not. Jimmy Broadbent has driven a few cars recently then drove them on the sim and said sims are far easier than real life. Nicky Thiim said ACC is a good game but laughed when someone asked if ACC is like real life. IMO all the proof you need that sims aren't close to real life.
That being said, most of the current crop of sim titles do a decent job of providing the "experience" of what it's like to drive and race a real race car.
When ever i see real life vs sim they look good to me.
I saw this morning on youtube a gtsports Nismo gtr vs a real gtr Nismo@nurbring and it looked identical with wheel input and times, speed.
Others say it is. You cant pick people that support the argument you want to be true and ignore all other proffesionals. The situation is simply complex.
You have lots of cars.
You have physics, which is different from the car model, which is different from the car parameters for each.
You have drivers that underatand FFB doesnt even attempt to replicate the real thing and learn ir before deciding how the car "drives". You have ones that drive 4 laps and dont modify a damn thing.
Others have used the driving on the limit argument but the limit in games and real life are different. Mahjik said it best, how is a £2000 computer going to simulate everything that goes on with a car? Even the million pound simulators F1 teams use aren't 100% accurate so to expect the average Joe's computer to cope with that is laughable IMO. I get they give a good sense of driving a car but realistic they are not. Maybe in 20 years or so but ATM "sims" are just games that give a sense of what it might be like to drive the cars IRL. You say about the GTR but what about me going 19 seconds quicker around the Nordschleife in the zonda R?
99% of the time, it's the other way around... Harder than real life.. Why? Because you don't have all the same sensations as well as fidelity of the controls like a real race car. Nicky is a good example. You'll see him lose control of the sim cars at times where as you won't see him get that out of control in a real car. There are just a lot of sensations you can't replicate at home, even with tactile devices and VR.
Would like to see some real racers with a 'Safe' and 'Not aggressive' setup with close lap times to this ones. And the real life driver obviously using a much aggressive line and using all of the track on the limit, yet he isn't faster than the guy below, who is not aggressive at all and driving like on the road. This just makes me think that ACC is very easy, and also pretty unrealistic accordingly.