Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm wondering if this could somehow be related to the reduced maintenance bar / durability of leased equipment. If a poorly maintained header/combine actually reduces yield, then perhaps it's just not possible to harvest enough to meet the contract minimum. Probably a stretch, but who knows.
However, The second part you mentioned, "reduced yields due to maintenance" is spot on I think. If I recall correctly, the harvester I was useing/leasing was about half way down on its maintenance bar at the end of the field. So the missing 1% make sence, because they treat the "jobs" machinery (leased) just like your owned ones. Admittedly, not sure how the programming would work out.
Harvest yield, to my knowledge, is only effected by fertilizing, weeding, plowing, and spreading lime.
100% sure. I am talking about the header either. The header only affects the speed, the harvester is what affects quantity.
The header maintenance affects speed of harvest, the harvester maintenence affects quantity of harvest.