安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Thanks for that, love the look. Can't wait for mods.
ah, true, granted most people here's first experience with it is going to be on the ds, that said, looking at the first ones to come natively on the ds, the artstle stayed more or less the same with the backgrounds gaining a bit of detail, the art style was still more or less there. I think this is the biggest thing missing from the hd release, the artstyle in the characters is missing. Like I said last time, the one with phenix write is likely one of the better examples, especially the ones on the witness stand loose quite a lot due to being stripped of the artstyle in favor of a high res draw over.
Pixel look is superior in every way and I will gladly look down upon anyone who says they're better. You have incorrect personal tastes, there's no reason to enjoy them (unless ironically). If you somehow can't see the truth, keep those opinions to yourself so you don't taint other people's views and encourage them to play the game wrong.
As for maintaining aspect ratio, it is imperative to do so. For potential modders: Do NOT skimp out on this, the framing is very important for Ace Attorney. DO NOT attempt to redraw the sprites to have them fit 16:9. If you can't force a 4:3 through the engine somehow, I can't imagine why you wouldn't, add black bars to the screen, heck, maybe even add art to it so we have a nice little frame.
OR Capcom can do what they should have done from the start and give us this option, that way console players can also benefit. I know Ace Attorney as we know it can only exist due to dedicated fans, but maybe it's time for Capcom to give them a break.
Ideas for potential 16:9 frames when using original graphics: black bar, the new cover art of the characters in the games they're in, that one 8-bit wallpaper that comes with the game I think, a courtroom-themed frame, original cover art from the games. Anyone else have any good ideas?
lol Guy, you must be trolling. The DS pic looked like a jagged mess. I admit the HD sprites leave a lot to be desired but if you think that blurry pixalated mess is in any way appealing, you should really take off the nostalgia glasses..
You don't see me throw a hissyfit and insult other people's taste over the HD art just because it's HD, traced or whatever, and neither should you when it comes to people who likes pixel art.
I said this before: I personally don't mind about the HD art, it's adequate but I much prefer Apollo Justice HD graphics for its better shading and softer outlines.[www.spriters-resource.com]
Yes and I agree the apollo sprites are of much higher quality, I wish they would have went that route with the HD sprites.The're are actual line variation in the inking for one, instead of the same constant level of thickness, which give the characters more depth. Instead of looking like it was traced by a 5 year old with a black 8B coloring pencil.
And I have no idea how you can't enjoy GBA and DS pixel art on a 1080p screen, or even a 4k screen. I can't picture any other way for you to think that unless you were dropped on your head as a baby, or maybe your parents and teachers raised you wrong so you could only enjoy higher fidelity artwork even if it ruins, or isn't even the original. I can't pull out a BS excuse for not arguing about this like "you do you bro" because I don't want people to be scammed. I don't think you guys really want this either, if everyone was smart (like me, lol) you would clearly value the original over the replacements. But most untermensch can't even think for themselves, let alone think about the value of art and artistic integrity. If no one else is willing to stand up and insult the masses for being wrong, who will?
I understand that telling those who believe lies the truth will only make them dig their heels in more and believe the lie more. But I think the more I expose the truth to those people, the more likely they will see it and eventually turn over a new leaf.
Also can someone tell me if there were masters of the backgrounds for the GBA games, that almost feels like something they would have done, but I doubt it. If there were masters that were lost to time, like with FF7, I could understand redrawing it, not that it would need it cause it looks good and timeless to begin with. But they would need to keep everything the same as before. Like I said earlier, changing the court doorway messed up the framing of the witnesses.
Then I grew up and learned a golden phrase "art is never finished, you just stop producing it at some point and released". Not everything can turn out as originally intended in production, final games may not represent what creator wanted and, finally, creator himself may change his intention during development. Then what makes us that the touches made after the original product ruin "the complete and perfect intention"? After all, said product could just as easily change in same way if more time was given before release by the very same creator.
And that's how I stopped being so touchy over any HD changes. Now it's case-by-case scenario for me.
And in this case I don't see how any limitation works for AA. It's not like when going widescreen may increase the playable area of fighting game.
And no, I don't like people who can't handle pixel art either
If a painter sold his work to a museum, but then he wanted to go back and touch it up, he'd be wrong in doing so because the way he released it was a window frame into his state of mind at the time, and if his state of mind at the time allowed him to look over small errors, that shouldn't be changed
Old paintings can be restored, but the purpose of that is to take art that has decayed over time and bring it back to what it was originally. Digital art does not have this same problem, especially digital art that was released only 20 years ago. And art restorers don't have the gall to think their revisions should be the final way to view that art. They make their paints safely removable, and record all the revisions they made so future generations can know the history of the painting.
Really, changing art, like they did for this release, is morally wrong. If getting older means rejecting this truth, I want to remain college-aged forever. And shoot, when I was 14-16 years old, I thought it was fine to add onto an original release of a work too, I even justified the Star Wars Special Editions, but we all grow up eventually. Maybe I'll reject my morals as I grow older and more tired and no longer feel like fighting.
Out of all the asinine ridiculous ludicrous ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ overreaction nonsense arguments I have ever seen in my life this has to be among the worst.
I get that some of you people don't like the new altered art. But not including your nostalgia trip pixel art graphics to a newly released HD version of the game is MORALLY WRONG? JFC I wonder what other kind of arguments are going to come up to destroy people's brain cells in this thread.
The original art still exists in it's original form the way it was released and it's not disappearing anywhere so the new HD release does not in any shape or form harm the original GBA cartridges. Not to mention how digitized roms and emulators also help preserve those titles.
At this point I don't even mind that people are throwing a hissy fit over the new art. None of the complaints so far have topped this being "morally wrong".