Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"burn" is a common unofficial term that players tend to use. That being said, they should probably use the official terminology.
No, this is false. I mean, stamina potions are of course overpowered (and I even agree on houseruling them, and I am happy enough to use the "new" version cause yes, theyre ooverpowered as hell), but the board game, even the most recent reprint still has the old values. And officialy, developer has not changed it. He months ago said he would probably change them in the future, but he has not yet do it.
So no, stamina potions here do not much the boardgame, any edition of it.
The FAQ (found online) includes the weaker stamina potion iteration, and not the actual printed version of the 2nd ED. As far as I am aware, there are no printed cards with the current official FAQ values.
I have the opinion that the 1/2 is the more balanced version of the potions, rather than the 2/3 strength ones. Anyone who has played (Triple Spears) would understand why.
So probably we are all right at the end, lol. Probably Dormak owns a non-english 2nd printed version and in his name the potion is nerfed, while I got an english new version which is not. It is said will change in the future, but is not changed YET.
Anyway, we all agree those potions as overpowered, though honestly I think it would be better if the digital version gives you an option to chose which rules you want to use. Just in case some people probably prefer the current (and yet oficial) version.
Yes they are overpowered.. but it is because the cost is 10g not because their effect is too strong.
Whatever the "official" terminology is, the PC version sometimes calls them "Burned" and sometimes calls the "Lost".
I'm really curious if "Lost" is in fact a different status. Like "really" burned i.e. Sunkeeper's "Brilliant Prayer".
Yes and no.
The cost made them a no brainer at the start, yes, but the real brokenness is the ability to spam fantastic cards several turns in a row. There is no room that can't be trivialized with 2 Infernos, for example. Or any of the Nightshroud's abilities. This becomes more of an issue the higher level you get.
The nerf makes them more in line with their cost, and their strength. I initially resisted the change, but having played a significant amount of hours now with nerfed cards, they are absolutely, unequivocally better this way.
"Burned" makes it clearer that the card is gone for good. Ask a random person who has never played whether lost or discarded is the one that basically removes from the game, it's a tossup which one they'll get right. Discarded vs. burned, they're more likely to get it right. It's a minor thing, but it's Isaac approved and it improves clarity and that's really all it comes down to.