Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The proper term then would be a proto-type of Pike and Shot warfare. The early version of Pike and Shot warfare in Europe were actually conducted with crossbows before being gradually replaced with firearms.
See thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3rsdsm/its_1580s_england_i_am_an_archerlongbowman_and_im/cwr9b7g/
"The decline of bowmen was rather quick. At the start of English intervention on behalf of Protestant Scotland, it was reported the ratio of footmen were roughly equal between pikes, bills, longbows, and calivers (a type of small arquebus). The bills were discarded and replaced with halberds immediately. The longbows were replaced by others, according what was available. By 1595, longbowmen were categorized among unarmed men."
Renaissance Armies: The English—Henry VIII to Elizabeth, An article by George Gush
"The Burgundian Compagnie d'ordonnance was a formidable combined arms force relying on close cooperation between heavily armored knights, dismounted men-at-arms, a variety of ranged troops including archers and crossbowmen, and an early form of field artillery. It was one of the most feared and most effective ground forces in 15th-century Europe, fresh from its victory over the French in the dynastic conflicts that followed the end of the Hundred Years' War. In response to the Burgundian threat the Swiss developed a tactic that could be used by mobile, lightly armored soldiers carrying only a long, steel-tipped pole for defence." [Note, we'll have to look up the citation]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pike_square
Incorrect. You do not really see a combination of pikes and massed ranged firepower except in ancient China and in Pike & Shot era Europe.
Macedonian pikes were used to pin enemy in place while cavalry/flexible infantry flanked them to deliver the killing blow. They were not really used in conjunction with massed ranged firepower as a flexible stand-alone offensive and defensive formation. Same goes for medieval Byzantine pikemen, Scottish pikemen, etc. None of these pike formations have much in common with the Pike & Crossbow or Pike & Shot tactics.
Any bonus points for citations?
*lol not all of it works but I wanted to one up my previous post
That should be more interesting than the "relatively" more defensive and slower paced Macedonian pikes that had to rely on other units for hammer and anvil tactics.
Lol, I'm not a history major either. I think most people understand pike and shot.
THX
also we want a 15 min break every 4 hours of battle. lucnh time betewn 12h and 13 during battle. No stabing below the chest, earing protection on the batttle at all time require, protective glass, hard hat and feet protection boot.
oh and an prtable bathroom in close proximity of the battle field.
oh yeah plz add a paid day off the battle filed when a someone you know die.. ahahahahah