安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Shi Xie controls a lot of land, most of it quite well-developed, therefore giving him more than enough Prestige to become one of the three also. Other factions may control MORE territory, but his is simply MORE advanced. This means that he is very likely to become one of the emperors if you expand quickly enough to trigger the event - he expands slowly, but consistently, so it takes some time for other factions to outpace him.
Who becomes emperor is based on who are the most powerful warlords at the time.
I think the game is just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ with me.
You can kinda guess at who is going to be a contender for the throne based on wthe global strength rating, but it's not always telling.
In my Liu Chong game, I was concerned that Liu Bei would form the Kingdom of Shu-Han because nearly every step of the way he was equivalent or stronger than me.
I eventually made him my vassal and was expecting him to declare an independence war in the endgame while declaring himself emperor... But my two contenders ended up being Cao Cao and Sun Ce to my south (both weaker than Liu Bei).
Liu Bei just looks mighty because he can field twice as many armies at 50% cost as long as they're full of militia units, but Sun Ce and Cao Cao either control more territiories OR have more high level cities and counties which stacks on a ton of Prestige.