Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You do realize, that this game is about a civil war where there is tons of objection to rulership from every possible side?
They never had an effective system to prevent corruption from court members which is what lead to the ultimate fall of the han. But the han was one of many dynasties that suffered this fate.
However, the Han was when this had escelated to a point that the yellow turban rebellion erupted, which meant that countless warlords had to fight to defeat them all across china. At which point because of unrest in the capital, Dong Zhou saw a chance to take the current child emperor for himself.
After multiple significant events that the other warlords disagreed with, the large scale coalition was formed. This is touched in a fair bit in the game but is not really explained fully and in detail.
The point is, supreme rule was far from a thing, before, and even after the three kingdoms.
Even the three kingdoms themselves suffered the same fate. After the time of the big names fell, corruption took hold once again. The Sima clan took over wei and saw that Shu and Wu had also suffered their own corruption.
This was when the stalemate finally ended, and the Jin dynasty was formed.
Idk what happened after. But there you go.
The full story can be interpreted in countless different ways, especially so with the fictional element of the novel.
What you should know though is that the historical versions of some of the big names were actually just as cool and as badass as their romance counter parts. Zhao Yun kinda became a meme.
Prick him with a needle and he will bleed to death. For example >.>
This was due to how untouchable he was, which is why in romance mode, he is so focused one evasion. My current campaign has him nearly at 200 expertise lol.
Back on topic though. Three Kingdoms is one of the most chaotic periods in all of earths history.
But anyways, this is off topic now, still doesn't make sense that my spy who I'm still paying for and have complete control over with their spy actions now has their own faction and it gives me no bonuses. You incite them to start a civil war and they get like a 3 territory plot of land against the whole 30 territory faction they've inherited. They should have implemented something better for this event, even if it's not total subjugation or vassalization, perhaps things like taking control of certain armies, starting proxy wars, under the table payments, etc.
That's what I was thinking, a form of puppet state that doesn't necessarily have to be complete control or even obvious ownership, but something more that actually makes you feel like you have some form of control over the faction.
If you are curious, it didn't go well for Jin. China was back in chaos after a few decades.
There are legitimate historical records from the period. Unlike Romance of the Three Kingdoms, many of them are likely even mostly true. For example, Records of the Three Kingdoms was written by a historian who lived during the Three Kingdoms period.
Even stuff like temper seems like it applied to more than just him. There was something about Cao Cao killing thousands of civilians after his father's death and he left his territory undefended. Half the reason Lu Bu wanted to kill dong zhuo is because he got upset and almost killed Lu Bu (although nothing ever implied to me Dong Zhuo could handle his temper).
The wikipedia stuff says things like he switched alliances erratically and betrayed allies, and was always suspicious of others. But the thing is, the suspicion of others was logical, because a huge amount of them were trying to kill him. And it makes betraying allies make more sense (not to mention there seems to have just been a ton of that in general, its nothing specific to him). It says he couldn't control subordinates, but honestly it never seems like he got enough power that people wouldn't be prepared to betray him for a better deal (and he probably wasn't all that likable).
Basically what I'm trying to say is just that he made quite a few logical decisions along the way, but dramatized it seems like the entire focus is just on how strong a warrior he was. So I got the impression that if say yuan shao was trying to assassinate him in his sleep, he'd either get assassinated, or hear the assassins sneaking up on him and beat them in combat. Not sneak out and put a subordinate in his place.
Regardless, there should be more options, there are actually no new options when your spy becomes faction leader. I think it's just one of those things that CA totally overlooked after awhile or couldn't decide what to do since it would be a semi-rare occasion.