Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Make sure to add it in the guides section.
It will be even more amazing with Images for each relevant section.
On on the Azure dragon, I will always feel safe and comfortable when they are in my frontlines.
The enemy cannot do much against them and they hold the line quite well.
Is it true that there isn't anything to counter them effectively :)?
Did not know this O_O
What is battle realism? Isnt that on by default and prevents pause?
Onyx Bows are redudent in your army, not a good unit, and forces useless tech to unlock. Fire is the only reason to have bowmen mid-late game and Azure dragons already fufill that role.
Crossbow Range - 250 range good vs armor
Onyx Bow- 200 range bad vs armor
Azure Dragons - 200 range bad vs armor
Onyx dragons are not really worth it, especially with kong rong. There is 0 reason to use bows over crossbows with azure dragons and catapults. Its redunent. The tech tree to unlock them isnt that beneficial or vital like green and corruption. They lack range and armor to protect against range, which means catapults would have to waste ammo vs crossbows. I would suggest crossbow archers, as their chain coincides with admin which is vital to get so its only 1 point.
With a good blue commander and levels, something common late game, crossbows outplay even the best bowmen. They have more then enough ammo and can direct counter enemy ranged units with added range. Bowmen including Onyx dragons also lack armor piercing damage, which become the main stay of AI armies mid-game on harder difficulties. They can shoot faster with far less effect. The armies on lengendary laugh off light archers after turn 75. Even turn 20 on a princess campaign AI armies are full armored.
Why do you have range in a non-blue retinue? Specializing armies is pretty necasarry and should be done early on. Having 2 blues in one army is not-worth the pay off. Ammo, rate of fire, damage, etc are all effected by a blue CO.
Why would you swap out Azure Dragons for onyx dragons when you already have retinue of range? You give up melee unit for slightly more bow ammo, thats it. If I was forced to not use crossbows, I would ditch the onyx dragons for more Azure Dragons and a green/red CO.
Onyx Dragons are really really late game too, far to late to have any effect on Lengedary. Tech tree for most factions is green then admin/military for corruption. I would have to give up alot vital tech and Azure dragons to unlock before I unite China. Unless your spending 200-300 turns beating the campaign, I cant every see unlocking them.
If you want a good light ranged unit, play Kong Rong. He gets the crossbow version
This build i mention has a different playstyle than what you are describing but with it you can take any settlement and any force you encounter without ANY losses. As long as you are patient and let them come to you, or creep up at your max range slowly, your melee units will never even see melee outside of finishing off the remains inside really well garisoned keeps defended by a stack.
You have a lot of misconceptions about Onyx units. Onyx are not 200 range they are 250 range, and their ammo advantage is huge to that of other ranged units, especially Xbows. The fury and thunder units kong rong can get are pretty comparable, but if you want fire you need onyx. As a trade based economy he should be going down that tree anyways, so it definitely isnt a worthless branch. Though I dont use them in melee, they also have that huge advantage over Xbows in case they do get stuck in one.
The reason i stick them in a non blue commanders unit is just for numbers, 3 isnt enough range units with 250 range, need at least 5. 3 trebs is necessary on some keeps to make sure you can take down all siege defenses without any losses and still have ammo for AI's 250 range units. Specializing helps, but isnt at all necessary. In this build you just need to make sure you have an arrow for every enemy, which is why the Onyx and their large ammo supply work so well.
With the way ai behaves in this TW title and the effectiveness of range, it really doesnt matter what you add to a unit that has 3 trebs, 6 onyx dragons and a couple Defenders of Earth to be honest. That build will always force the enemy to march on you, and you will wipe everything before it ever reaches your line,. My 3 or 4 melee units just stand there and do nothing 9 out of 10 fights. Even my generals dont need to do much other than counter the enemies Gens.
As good as azure may be in your build, they would just collect dust aside from firing their bow a couple times if you stick them behind 3 trebs, 6 onyx and 2 DOE. Combine with night battles and it really doesnt matter what the ai does, you will be able to endlessly wipe their single stacks since you will have zero losses at the end of the fight. So long as you break their Xbows before they get in range of you (and ai usually doesnt have too many) you will finish ever fight with every soldier you started it with.
I would call Onyx mid game, with late game upkeep. I have unlocked and added them to an army by turn 40, though their upkeep cost made them few and far between that early.
I think you should play the game on legendary, it would put a lot of things that I said into perspective. That's what this strategy was made for.
I think you would enjoy playing the game on legendary because it will force you to learn mechanics you yet to discover in the game. Like how to force peace between two factions, the multiple ways on how to absorb another faction via diplomacy or War, how to have a full army garrison in a city permanently, or the depth of the spying system.
Fire arrows are for destroying enemy structures and lighting brush a blaze. Which makes no sense to have a unit with low armor and high cost be a suicide unit. In mid to late game you should almost never have them turned on, Onyx dragons are already weak verse armor no need to make them weaker.
Ammo is not what you think it is. Ammo When comparing should be how many units can my unit kill before it runs out. So even though crossbow men have less missiles they do more damage meaning more kills before they run out. You can shoot a thousand 9mm rounds at a tank, still won't do as much damage as one armor piercing round. Which is why crossbow men have virtually the same ammo as bowman late game. Especially considering during that's a vast majority of battles will be over with archers still having ammo.
Onyx dragons weren't just a redundant in your army because of range. Which at full range it's still going to be a problem on moving targets due to the slow trajectory of the arrow, crossbows have less travel time. The main thing your army is lacking is armor piercing damage via range. The majority of late game units will laugh off arrows from light archers even Onyx dragons.
On an easier difficulty there are definitely a large variety of tactics you can use to beat the game. But on legendary doing a beeline for Onyx dragons is not going to work out.
Onyx Dragons at turn 40, ok bud. You started this convo hating on people for bringing up the fact they play on legendary, and then feel the need to make up lies about your own gameplay. Insecurity is a horrible stench.
This Thread is for helping other people and discussing battle strategies, you lying about your gameplay to make a poor strategy seem more feasible does none of that. Even if it was possible, I guarantee you admitting to everyone you rush Silk Road as your only Tech is not accomplishing what you think it is.
I have the game saved on that playthrough all the way back to turn 40 or so with liu bei on either very hard or legendary so I will go check. You assume a lot and seem to think only legendary offers diplomacy, or forcing peace before telling me the army I roll regardless of difficulty wont work lol. A force you obviously havent had much experience with if you think Onyx range is only 200, or that they are replaceable with Xbow. Legendary doesnt make the ai more strategicially competent going from very hard, (or arguably even hard) to legendary. It just gives it a lot of numerical advantages.
Instead of calling people liars and making insecure comments about insecurity, just get in the game and do the math. Maybe try the army i suggested and realize you didnt crack the code you just enjoy using Azures, much like i enjoy fire spam and using Onyx archers.
Be open minded, try a custom battle and use your force and keep track of your losses then turn around and use one that is
1 Strat and 1 other general suited for fire arrow and ranged, last will usually have cav
3 Trebuchet
5-7 Onyx Dragon
2 Defenders of Earth (not as necessary or cool post nerf, just fun to mop up with. Build was really OP feeling pre Treb / DOE balancing)
4+ cav
I usually have 1 strategist, preferrably one with brilliant, though sieges are the only time ammo might be needed with Onyx's huge quivers. The other two generals I try to make sure serve opposing purposes. One anti-general, another anti Infantry.
if you are good at manipulating the ai's deployment and movement using your own cavalry then get them to blob up with it early to eat the fire spam before flanking them and you can literally lose next to nothing in most battles.
Its not all about damage, the combined fire spam of Trebuchet, Doe and Onyx breaks them so fast your melee experience only involves chasing down the runners with cavalry.
As long as you fight night battles to stop reinforce (upside of another -15 to their morale) and dont get sloppy, you will never need to have a second army to fight with or waste much time waiting for troops to replenish, but it does get pretty ZZzzz after a while
This discussion is interesting and beneficial for me. There's no need to call each names man :).
Let's keep it about the game please so it won't derail the thread please.
What faction.
And this was Legendary, right? Because again that's not what this thread was geared towards. No strat is bad on campaign mode and should be based on entertainment. If you want to rush light missiles, have fun. But if you want to contribute towards this thread I suggest playing/beating the game in legendary first.
Was Liu Bei.
Course once I got there I realised how expensive they are in relation to your economy that early. After I finally got the 5th or 6th for main army it was a while before i had ehough to start giving them to other generals.
Unless you use a mod for upkeep reduction or dont field a lot of forces its of limited use to rush them. That was done back when I was playing mod free vanilla so upkeep and unit price were a bit crippling as I remember back.
Since then I have tried some mods that made the game so much better. If you try one for upkeep try the 25% for ai and player, that makes a nice change for the better with the ai Imo.
Lets them have a few more forces out but not overkill.
You can do it on legendary too, was the same army i used both playthroughs I played on legendary before using mods to make game actually BE harder. I am guessing you guys are new, but going from very hard to legendary only gives the ai numeric advantage, that is all. It does not make it harder to fight in battles in or any smarter or any more strategic. Get a mod for AI if you actually want smarter ai, get a mod to lower their upkeep if you want them to have real army. Turn it up on legendary if you want to brag that you play it on legendary.
You have admittedly played only 2 factions, think Onyx archers are useless because they only have a 200 range (making me think probably 2-3 total playthroughs) and after making a thread called "The best mid-late game Army, formation, and tactics" you dismiss people with 500 hours in offering advice because you figured out how to put blue , yellow and green units in with a matching colored general.
Unsub.
I didnt call him names, that is against Steam forum rules. I simply called him out on his lies, you cant get Onyx Archer turn 34 and that he didnt do it lengendary. Which he has admitted I was correct about. You also cant load old save on Legendary, something everyone who plays it knows, but he has yet to realize. I was ready to eat dirt if he was right, but when he admitted he could load back to previous his claims about legendary fell apart.
He started this convo insulting and spent his entire time not understanding thats strat on easy dont auto-convert to legendary. There is no reason to have a convo about strats on easy, the game does not require specific strats on that difficulty. I would challenge him to play his strat on lengendary as it would put what Im saying into perspective.
The idea of rushing Onyx Dragons is as good or better then rushing Azure Dragons is laughable. Even the devs agree with me with the rebalance in 8 princes, onyx dragons are tech 3 with Azure Dragons being tech 4. They are worlds apart. Actually when you google "Onyx Dragons" the threads that come up are how they are not worth the tech tree, not a good unit, and not nearly as worth it as Azure dragons. This isnt just coming from me, the green tree universally recognized as the best tree followed by corruption chain. The bonus from blue can be unlocked passively thru buildings and prestige and purple isnt usefull prior to corruption. Besides upgrades to build up garrison in mines and slave mobilisation, only 1 point each, purple is late-game. Corruption gets out of control real quick. Those bonus to eco dont stack on each other but act as a combined % boost and only apply to your base income. My eco usually grows by 40% in a turn when I unlock the final admin building.
If you read his review of this game, its obvious he lacks a basic understanding of the games mechanics. Which is how I knew he wasnt playing on Lengendary before he finally admitted it. He critcizes the game for things the game has, but he just hasnt figured out how to do. Its really comical because the things he criticizes in the game are soley due to his poor playstyle and rush to useless techs. In his own words he admits the strat is junk, he was just to arrogant to admit it was himself and blames the game.
If this guy was lying about marrying Jennifer Lawrence, I would of said cool. If he was lying about a 7.8 kd in fortnite, I would of said cool. But when he lies about beating legendary with a junky strat and saying he gets Onyx dragons turn 34 (impossible) on a thread meant to help people on Legendary, Im gonna call him out. Legendary takes hours and can be undone due to one small mistake. Its extremely hard and unforgiving. So yeah I dont want people wasting hours rushing silk road only to have to restart because his insecurities and lies.
I have no problem saying Legendary is an extreme challenge for me. Most my advice comes from reddit, youtube, and forums, whith almost none of it being mine. Im not gonna be like him and try to act cool by saying its easy and not a challenge. Video games arent a source of pride for me.
To be honest I knew nothing intelligent was gonna from a man who starts a convo insulting people by calling them vegans for stating a thread is for Legendary strats. If other people talking about strats to beat legendary makes a person feel so insecure they need to insult, its pretty obvious they have internalized insecurities flooding out. People dont feel insecure about accomplishments, they feel insecure about failures. Which the whole reason I the difficulty that into thread was so people like him wouldnt argue strats they did on easy mode, because they dont transfer to legendary.