安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
To be honest I think he rather enjoyed the game though I think he would have liked that one of the Devs spoke to him first. (He wouldn't have put $100 into the game if he didn't like it.)
...game's not about furries. People really need to stop mislabeling.
The Shaggy Dog film series isn't a furry franchise, and neither is this.
You messed up your reply a bit there. You have the wrong people on the quotes.
As for the rest, we'll agree to disagree, since I find a far larger distinction than just "there's animals, it is *must* be furries!" :P
You don't need to ask someone's permission to base a character on them. He's not even mentioned by name. If the character was named Markiplier, AND it was an unfavorable misrepresentation of him, then it would be a different story.
You could still argue it's a bit disrespectful to put someone in a dating sim without their knowledge, but I personally the think it's vague enough for it to be kinda silly for someone to have a problem with it. Mark is entitled to feel however he feels about it, but there's not much he can do about it.
It would be bad optics for Mark to go after them legally, as it could very much look like he would be doing so simply because the dating sim itself is rather queer-coded, since there are lots of other creative work that references him that he's had no problem with in the past.
At the end of the day he looked like he was having fun, and most of the comments were not so much about the look of the character but the things the character said, like being the "KING of 5 nights at Freddy's..." Um well almost. ;)