Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The further the game went on, the more I started to understand what was actually going on. This game is basically a fetish fantasy. There's a lot of bdsm themes, torture porn, and just general weird stuff that you only end up seeing in some psychotic person's basement. There's multiple instances of people begging to be tortured and to feel pain, and they feel pleasure when it happens.
Beyond the half way point of the game is when I strongly got the impression that they crammed their fetishes into the game and then slapped on a story to create an excuse for it to exist. Which would also explain why the story is so terrible. So many people will defend this game and claim the story is the most amazing thing ever. But I can guarantee that anyone playing through this blind, without any outside knowledge of the game or plot analysis of any sort, will have no idea what is happening.
You must not know a whole lot about the history of religious suffering/penance if all you can see is “fetish material”. Its a theme thats common in many paths of belief. I dunno what you mean by “torture porn”, this ♥♥♥♥ is tame compared to in real life belief systems its based off of. No offense but this post just came off as really ignorant of a few things (including BDSM but we wont get into that).
There's the lady that is tied up in a sort of silky bed and being constantly whipped. Being whipped was a form of punishment, but in this case she's taking pleasure from it. Religious stuff didn't punish people if they enjoyed it because that's defeating the purpose of being punished.
There is the guy that grew into the tree. He begged for punishment and pain and was turned into a tree. Once again, he found pleasure in that as he smiled and felt relief as his body transformed. Religious punishment isn't supposed to make the person happy.
There's a lot more examples. It's easy to see the things in this game from a different perspective if you actually took the time to look. But instead you decide to try and insult a person, which only makes me wonder if it's even worth trying to continue this discussion. The tin foil hat comment makes no sense since I wasn't spouting anything to do with conspiracies or being paranoid in any sort of way. There's also nothing in what I said that shows any form of ignorance since I wasn't stating anything in a factual or knowledgeable way.
Because whats more likely, that theres a hidden story that you simply don’t understand/haven’t had explained adequately yet or that the devs just said “♥♥♥♥ it, torture porn” and made a whole game about it. Thats why I said it sounded tinfoil suit-y. I just think you’re looking at it from a very shallow out of context angle.
And yeah, you’re not *supposed to take pleasure from punishment, but some people do.The parts of your brain that feel pain are closely associated with pleasure, and thus historically, emotionally and thematically speaking some people derive pleasure from pain. It doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with gratification, moreso relief or absolvement of guilt though, and as far as I’m aware (gotten 95% so far) there isn’t any outright statements or implications that any character enjoys whats happening.
Its like if you looked at my artwork out of context for example and said “well, I dunno why this guy constantly draws people bleeding and holding swords, I think he just likes violence”. Theres a lot more factors that go into it
Bing bang bong. The concepts of religeons requiring self-abuse or self-mutilation (generally ritually) is pretty common throughout history. While a penitent flagellant might suffer from the pain and experience no pleasure from it, they might beg for more abuse because they feel the torture is a way of cleansing their soul.
Yes it is, at least in some cases. Aquinas, for instance, clearly speaks of the fact that, though punishment is prima facie something unpleasant, it is however pleasant inasmuch as it provides relief from the angst of sinfulness, as the previous poster rightly suggests. The tapestry of traditional religious feelings is rich and diverse and, provided that one can reasonably be said to obey God's commands in a meaningful way, pretty much anything goes, I would say.
Dude, the whole of christian religion is about, martyrdom, suffering and punishment. Jesus suffered and died for your sins, to save you from eternal hell. A lots of christian saints endured gruesome torture happily for their believes. Suffering is a form of penitence which grants forgivness and salvation, just take a look of christian self-flagellants. Blasphemous draws exclusively from that aspect and turns it into overdrive. Everybody is so much into pain in the game, because they believe the gruesome fate of the miracle can only be absolved through penitence and suffering, and they are happily doing it, because it means they will be saved. Really, no disrespect, but the whole punishment stuff is main aspect of abrahamic religions, which blasphemous is based on...
You can also pretend that your character in Doom (1993) is a completely naked female supermodel with a gruff voice who's fighting through hell to rescue her lover, who was damned for being a lesbian.
And, of course, when playing Asteroids (1979) it's the most fun when you consider that you are a manifestation of a dreaming human ESPer who is trying to prevent giant dragon eggs from hatching in space.
All we know is that (1) the Silent Sorrow's silence is not reversible - it is forced upon them by the Miracle like all others in this world. This is described in the prequel comic; and (2) Crisanta was part of whatever slaughtered them. Since the Penitent One's goal is to kill Escribar and Crisanta defends Escribar, it makes sense that Escribar authorized the action, but we don't know why. We also don't know why a character whose name seems associated with the Silent Sorrow (the Warden) seemed to partake in the slaughter as well.
I also don't think the world is as ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up as it is because of "a war between Escribar and the Silent Sorrow." The Miracle has had an influence on the world for centuries, according to the lore, and much of what we see in the world is entirely unrelated to what happened to the Silent Sorrow. For example, many of the creatures the Penitent One fights have an origin related to the Turned Throne and the Mountain of Ash, which happened far earlier than the beginning of the game.
It also seems clear that in Cvstodia, no one seems adamantly attempting to reverse or defeat the Miracle, or whatever entity it came from. So it's hard to say that the Penitent One is seeking to end the church or the religion. In fact, there are indicators that the Miracle is advocating or in control of all of this. Though why it would have the Penitent One kill many of its followers - like the bosses - is, again, unknown.
And I think that's okay. Not everything has to be definitively explained. It permits us the ability to disagree with each other on what's going on, and every little bit of info more we receive can help mold our opinions.