Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No male characters? Not allowing players to choose between male or female is a show stopper for me. Add the option to choose male or female, Ill buy this game.
Gee, you must not play a lot of games then, with all the male-only characters they have.
Totally agree. Not buying your Indentity politics.
Does playing "Ms Pac-Man" really feel substantially different to you than playing Pac-Man, just because the main character is female? Because that's the level of characterization that we're talking about here.
The game's core mechanic is pretty well designed btw - very easy to learn, quite challenging to master, with different paths to choose in any given situation (and it requires skill to see which path is the best one). It's certainly worth trying out, imho.
The bottom line is, this is a digital conversion of a physical board game, with artwork supplied by the original board game creator. Unless the creator of the physical board game provides alternate artwork, you're not going to see it in the digital version.
If you can't even be bothered to put together your own argument, and simply post a youtube video without even referencing how it would relate to the discussion, I'll go down to the same level of non-effort and simply assume that the video supports my argument. Thanks. ;D
(If you actually want to have a meaningful discussion, feel free to put together an actual argument that's related to the game that this forum is about.)
Games that happen to have all male characters = Fine, creators have a right to include what they want in games.
Game that happens to have all female characters = Evil SJW creators shoving identity politics down your throat.
More relevantly I feel like at this point any discussion on this game asking about "why all women" should just be auto-locked as it never goes anywhere productive.
It never goes anywhere productive because one side refuses all discussion or creates fun strawmen of evil gender-criminals to attack like you just did.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/770100/discussions/0/1777136225042596640/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/770100/discussions/0/1693788384129538709/
Lycentia pointed out the double standard of someone only complaining about games with characters of all of the same sex when they're games with all women characters.
I pointed out that "game that happens to have all female characters" =/= "SJW game" after someone made that strawman.
Psyringe pointed out that the game's theming is generic enough that the distinction isn't even terribly relevant to the gameplay.
So the fact that you're now coming in and strawmanning that into "that'll teach you" and similar sentiments regardless of what is actually said by anyone is precisely why I say we might as well just start locking these threads on sight now, as it's similar to what happened in the locked threads.
The fact that you look at discussions full of people coming in screaming about "SJWs" and "identity politics" and how they're not going to buy the game, for literally no reason other than the game happens to have all female characters, and regardless of what arguments everyone else actually does or doesn't make, and still conclude it's that somehow magically really everyone else who refuses all discussion and creates strawmen, is kind of exact proof of why these threads should just be auto-locked.
I still remain bemused whenever someone claims I'm wrong about my observing people do a certain thing and then proceeds to do exactly the very thing I made observations about.
(Also when people try claiming something wasn't said in the discussion when it's literally right there on the same page plain as day. Like, seriously?)