Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
... ! ... Ah, to answer your question, spoiling the game's plot twist will certainly affect your enjoyment of the game's narrative. Bioshock one, (and to a lesser degree, Infinite) relies on its brilliant plot twist far too much. Several missions are the epitome of filler, a prime example being the three-to-four hour chunk in which you have to travel halfway across Rapture to resurrect... The trees. Many people who laud Bioshock for the masterfully written storyline are most likely remembering the "would you kindly" revelation, rather than the aimless wandering through claustrophobic corridors. However, the game has an absolutely fantastic vibe, and the Wikipedia plot description does not spoil some of the game's best moments and side characters. The game is certainly worth buying, you just won't enjoy it quite as much as some of the other people you have heard on here.
I'd say Bioshock doesn't rely on a story too much.
Don't expect a level of Pathologic story or Spec Ops narrative from this game.
Anyway, you won't spoil anything. In Bioshock gameplay > story.
Unofrtunately after playing BI, bioshock 1's plasmid-or-weapon system doesnt feel good.. I guess I still still boot the game up again- thanks everyone!
Bah.