Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Isn't it already like that? Combining different ingridients makes better food packs.
Better only defined as higher caloric intake. So yes, in a way. Means you have to eat less often if it provides more "nutrition". But it's not an advantage per-se. I.e. eating 3 20-nutrition packs is exactly equivalent to eating 1 60-nutrition pack. Thus, there's no advantage to making better ones if you can just carry around a whole stack of 20-nutrition packs.
What I'd like to see is more incentive to use the better ones, and not just use potatoes forever.