Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- Emulator? Then it's a worthless comparison
- Signal recorded from the original console? Was it done via Components or VGA Box? Because the game on the Dreamcast actually looks pretty close to this version (minus resolution of course) in 4:3 via VGA, just a bit more blurry because of the Sampling this version has.
Well, in a lot of cases the term remaster as a warning label applies to games just the same as it does in music. Music remasters are in 99% of all cases worthless crap and the same applies to games where the term was used, like the Bioshock remasters that are a buggy, unplayable mess or everything Nightdive Studios pukes out, where they just port something, usually ♥♥♥♥ something up (like removing the fog in Turko 1 & 2 without thinking as far that the AI never was programmed to see as far as the player now can, turning the whole thing into a joke) and so on.
People hear remaster, demand it to be a full remake, and then think they can just pretend that's what the word means.